Open Access

Retinoic acid promotes myogenesis in myoblasts by antagonizing transforming growth factor-beta signaling via C/EBPβ

  • Émilie Lamarche1,
  • Neena Lala-Tabbert1,
  • Angelo Gunanayagam1,
  • Catherine St-Louis2 and
  • Nadine Wiper-Bergeron2Email author
Skeletal Muscle20155:8

DOI: 10.1186/s13395-015-0032-z

Received: 15 August 2014

Accepted: 18 February 2015

Published: 18 March 2015

Abstract

Background

The effects of transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) are mediated by the transcription factors Smad2 and Smad3. During adult skeletal myogenesis, TGFβ signaling inhibits the differentiation of myoblasts, and this can be reversed by treatment with retinoic acid (RA). In mesenchymal stem cells and preadipocytes, RA treatment can function in a non-classical manner by stimulating the expression of Smad3. Smad3 can bind to and prevent the bzip transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) from binding DNA response elements in target promoters, thereby affecting cell differentiation. In skeletal muscle, C/EBPβ is highly expressed in satellite cells and myoblasts and is downregulated during differentiation. Persistent expression of C/EBPβ in myoblasts inhibits their differentiation.

Methods

Using both C2C12 myoblasts and primary myoblasts, we examined the regulation of C/EBPβ expression and activity following treatment with TGFβ and RA.

Results

We demonstrate that treatment with RA upregulates Smad3, but not Smad2 expression in myoblasts, and can partially rescue the block of differentiation induced by TGFβ. RA treatment reduces C/EBPβ occupancy of the Pax7 and Smad2 promoters and decreased their expression. RA also inhibits the TGFβ-mediated phosphorylation of Smad2, which may also contribute to its pro-myogenic activities. TGFβ treatment of C2C12 myoblasts stimulates C/EBPβ expression, which in turn can stimulate Pax7 and Smad2 expression, and inhibits myogenesis. Loss of C/EBPβ expression in myoblasts partially restores differentiation in the presence of TGFβ.

Conclusions

TGFβ acts, at least in part, to inhibit myogenesis by upregulating the expression of C/EBPβ, as treatment with RA or loss of C/EBPβ can partially rescue differentiation in TGFβ-treated cells. This work identifies a pro-myogenic role for Smad3, through the inhibition of C/EBPβ’s actions in myoblasts, and reveals mechanisms of crosstalk between RA and TGFβ signaling pathways.

Keywords

Retinoic acid C/EBPβ TGFβ-signaling Skeletal muscle

Background

The canonical transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) pathway involves the binding of dimerized TGFβ family ligands to a constitutively active TGFβ type II cell surface receptor [1]. Ligand binding by the type II receptor promotes its association with the TGFβ type I receptor that is both phosphorylated and activated by the type II receptor [2]. The activated type I receptor then phosphorylates receptor Smad transcription factors (Smad2 and Smad3), which bind to Smad4 and translocate to the nucleus to regulate gene transcription [3,4]. Activation and consequent nuclear translocation of Smad2 and Smad3 by the TGFβ type 1 receptor is achieved by phosphorylation of distinct serine residues (Ser465/467 for Smad2 and Ser423/425 for Smad3) in their respective C-terminal tails [5-7].

While much is known about the activation of Smad3 activity, very little is known about the transcriptional pathways regulating Smad3 expression and the functional consequences of this activation in different cell systems. Smad3 expression is inhibited by isoprenoids in a Sp1/Sp3-dependent fashion [8], and mitogen-activated protein kinase A (MAPK) activity can stimulate Smad3 expression, by inhibiting Sp1 binding to a region between −849 and −408 of the Smad3 promoter [9]. Treatment with retinoic acid (RA) has also been shown to upregulate Smad3 mRNA expression in T cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and preadipocytes [10,11].

During myogenesis, treatment with TGFβ is known to potently, yet reversibly, inhibit the differentiation process [12-19]. TGFβ signaling can inhibit myogenesis through activation of Smad3, which can interfere with the formation of muscle regulatory factor-containing transcriptional complexes [12,13]. The muscle phenotype has been investigated in a Smad3 knockout model, in which a premature stop was introduced in exon 7, producing a truncated Smad3 lacking the C-terminal 89 amino acids encoded by exon 8, which contains the serine residues phosphorylated by the activated TGFβ type I receptor [18,20,21]. Loss of the C-terminal domain crippled TGFβ-mediated responses. Interestingly, Smad3 knockout mice had fewer satellite cells, the muscle stem cell primarily responsible for regeneration and repair; reduced myoblast proliferation; and smaller fiber caliber [20]. Moreover, muscle regeneration after acute injury was also reduced in the Smad3 knockout mice [21]. These findings suggested that Smad3 assumes a pro-myogenic role in muscle precursors, in sharp contrast to the potently anti-myogenic role of TGFβ signaling.

While both Smad2 and Smad3 bind the same DNA response element in target promoters and are both activated by the same receptor, there is growing evidence that these factors are not redundant in function. In the kidney, where TGFβ induces tubulo-interstitial fibrosis, Smad3 and Smad2 have been shown to regulate a different subset of genes [22,23]. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Smad3 and Smad2 exert opposite effects on growth and cellular migration, and in primed pluripotent cells, Smad3 was shown to be dispensable for the maintenance of the undifferentiated state [24,25]. Indeed, TGFβ has even been shown to inhibit the expression of Smad3 [26] further suggesting that Smad3 can counteract Smad2 activities in some systems.

In mesenchymal stem cells and preadipocytes, treatment with RA has been shown to influence the differentiation of adipocytes and osteoblasts at least in part by stimulating the expression of Smad3. In these systems, Smad3 acts in a non-classical manner, in that it is not C-terminally phosphorylated, but nonetheless affects the expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) and Runx2, the master regulators of adipogenesis and osteoblastogenesis, respectively [11,18,27-30]. Both C/EBPα and Runx2 are transcriptional targets of C/EBPβ, a bzip transcription factor involved in numerous cellular differentiation processes. C/EBPβ interacts with the Smad3 MH1 domain, which blocks C/EBPβ’s ability to bind its DNA response elements in target promoters. As such, increased Smad3 levels can abrogate C/EBPβ-mediated transcriptional responses [11]. During adipogenesis, RA treatment and the consequent increase in Smad3 expression prevents interaction of C/EBPβ with the C/EBPα promoter, decreasing expression of the master regulator resulting in the inhibition of differentiation. In contrast, RA can promote osteoblastogenesis by preventing C/EBPβ from interacting with the Runx2 promoter, where it acts as a negative regulator [27,29].

In muscles, C/EBPβ is expressed in satellite cells where it acts to maintain the undifferentiated state. Induction of satellite cells to differentiate is accompanied by a decrease in C/EBPβ expression; loss of satellite cell marker Pax7 expression, a C/EBPβ target gene; and the induction of myogenic regulatory factors such as myogenin [31]. Herein, we identify C/EBPβ as a novel TGFβ target gene that mediates, at least in part, the anti-myogenic effects of this signaling pathway. We demonstrate that C/EBPβ expression is upregulated by TGFβ treatment, and this leads to an increase in C/EBPβ target gene expression. Further, we identify Smad2 as a novel C/EBPβ target, creating an anti-myogenic feed-forward control loop. Loss of C/EBPβ expression, or interference with its ability to bind DNA through treatment with RA, can rescue myogenesis in TGFβ-treated cells.

Methods

Western analysis

Protein extracts were harvested with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and were analyzed using the following antibodies: C/EBPβ (C-19, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Smad2/3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), myogenin, Pax7, and myosin heavy chain (MF-20) primary antibodies from DSHB (Iowa City, IA, USA); and phospho Smad2/3 (Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.). β-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO, USA) was used as a loading control. HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were from GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, U.K.). Chemiluminescence images were captured using the Luminescent Image Analyzer LAS-4000 (Fujifilm Life Science, Tokyo, Japan), and quantifications were done using ImageJ (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2014).

Cell culture

C2C12 myoblasts (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Wisent, Saint-Bruno, QC, Canada) containing 4.5 g/L glucose, 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate, and 584 mg/L l-glutamine and supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To stimulate skeletal muscle differentiation, 80% confluent C2C12 cells were treated with DMEM containing 1% heat-inactivated horse serum (HS; Invitrogen) for 4 days. 3T3L1 cells (ATCC) were maintained in DMEM containing 4.5 g/L glucose, 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate, and 584 mg/L l-glutamine and supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated calf serum (HI-CS, Invitrogen). Primary myoblasts were freshly isolated from wild-type and C/EBPβ conditional knockout mice as previously described [31]. Briefly, a tamoxifen-sensitive CreER DNA recombinase driven by the Pax7 locus was used to excise Cebpb from homozygous mice bearing Loxp sites inserted on both ends of the Cebpb coding sequence. Excision of Cebpb was achieved with a 48 h treatment of isolated primary myoblasts with 2 μM 4-OH tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich). Isolated primary myoblasts were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Wisent) containing 20% FBS, 10% HS, 10 ng/ml FGF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), and 2 ng/ml HGF (Peprotech). Culture media and growth factors were replenished every day. Upon reaching confluence, primary myoblasts were switched to DMEM containing 2% FBS and 10% HS (low serum conditions) for 2 days in the presence of TGFβ or vehicle. Media and TGFβ were replenished every day.

Retroviral infection

Replication-incompetent pLXSN-based retroviruses (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) were generated in Phoenix Ampho packaging cells (ATCC) and have been described previously [30]. Virus was harvested 48 h after transfection. Following infection of C2C12 myoblasts, cells were selected in growth medium supplemented with 400 ug/mL G418 for 7 days to generate pooled stable cell lines.

Reagents

All-trans retinoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) was used at a concentration of 1 nM. TGFβ1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used at a concentration of 1 ng/ml for C2C12 cells and 5 ng/ml for primary myoblasts and changed every 24 h for the duration of the treatment.

RT-qPCR

For quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and contaminating DNA was digested with DNase (Ambion, Life Technologies, Austin, TX, USA). Subsequently, RNA was reverse transcribed using the iScript kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR reactions were performed with iTaq SYBR Green (Bio-Rad) on a Mx3005p thermocycler (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Relative fold induction was determined using the ΔΔCt method [32] following normalization with 18S rRNA.

Differentiation and fusion indices

To assess differentiation of C2C12 cells and primary myoblasts, immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-myosin heavy chain antibody (MF-20) from DHSB, which recognizes the fast and slow sarcomeric myosin heavy chains. The antibody was incubated overnight, followed by a Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) for 1 h. DAPI (0.5 μg/ml) counterstain was used to label chromatin. Pictures were taken of a minimum of six random field of view at × 10 magnification per well. The differentiation index is defined as the number of myosin heavy chain positive nuclei divided by the total number of nuclei. The fusion index is described as the number of myosin heavy chain positive nuclei in myotubes divided by the total number of myotubes.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

C2C12 myoblasts were cultured in growth or differentiation conditions and treated with RA or vehicle for 24 h as indicated. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis was performed as described [30] using antibodies for C/EBPβ (C-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), RAR (M-454; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or non-immunized normal rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) as control, incubating at 4°C overnight. After sonication, DNA fragments were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and amplified by qPCR. Primer sequences for the Pax7 promoter were as follows: forward 5′-CCCGAACTGGCCCCCTTTCC-3′ and reverse 5′-TCCCCCGGAGGACTGGAACG-3′. Primer sequences for the intronic RARE region of the Smad3 promoter were as follows: forward 5′-ATGACTTGTTCCTGTCCTTC-3′ and reverse 5′-GCTAGGCAGAGTTCCCAGAA-3′. Primer sequences for the Smad2 promoter were as follows: forward 5′-AAGTCCCTGGAGGGAATGGA-3′ and reverse 5′-CACTGTAGGCAGAGCAGGTT-3′.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com). The student’s t test was used when comparing a control and experimental condition in one group. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was used when comparing one factor in three or more groups. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test was used when comparing two factors in control and experimental conditions. Post-hoc tests followed only statistically significant ANOVA results (p < 0.05). Where multiple comparisons are possible, means are marked with a letter code. Means with different letters are significantly different from one another, meeting a minimum cutoff of P < 0.05. All experiments are representative of a minimum of three biological replicates, as indicated. Data represents the mean; error bars represent the SEM.

Results

RA regulates Smad3 expression in myoblasts

Consistent with our observations in mesenchymal stem cells and preadipocytes, both proliferating myoblasts cultured in growth medium (GM) and myoblasts cultured in low serum conditions to induce differentiation (differentiation medium, DM) had increased Smad3 mRNA expression following treatment with 1 nM RA (Figure 1A,B) [11,27]. Treatment with RA resulted in a significant 3-fold increase in Smad3 mRNA expression in growth medium as compared to vehicle-treated controls (Figure 1A). Similarly, under differentiation conditions, a 2-fold increase in Smad3 mRNA was observed as compared to vehicle-treated controls (Figure 1B). It should be noted that 1 nM RA did not adversely affect cell growth or differentiation, while higher concentrations of RA were toxic to the cells (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Figure 1

Retinoic acid upregulates Smad3 expression in myoblasts. (A) RT-qPCR analysis of Smad3 mRNA expression in C2C12 myoblasts cultured in growth medium and treated with vehicle or RA for 48 h. Data is shown as fold expression over vehicle-treated condition. Error bars are the SEM, *P < 0.05, n = 3. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of Smad3 mRNA expression in C2C12 myoblasts cultured in differentiation medium and treated with vehicle or RA for 48 h. Data is shown as fold expression over vehicle-treated condition. Error bars are the SEM; *P < 0.05, n = 3. (C) Schematic representation of the mouse Smad3 locus found on the minus strand of chromosome 9 using the Mouse Dec. 2011 (GRCm38/mm10) Assembly. Location of the transcript, including 5′ and 3′ UTRs, is indicated as well as the predicted CpG island (%CG = 65.9%, length = 1,436 bp, ObsCpG/ExpCpG =0.80). The position of a RARE identified by ChIP-seq analysis in ES cells undergoing neurogenesis (GSM482750) between exon 3 and 4 of the Smad3 gene is also indicated. (D) Analysis of retinoic acid receptor (RAR) occupancy of the RARE in the intronic region of the mouse Smad3 gene by chromatin immunoprecipitation and qPCR in C2C12 cells in growth medium. Data represents the mean; error bars are the SEM; *P < 0.05, n = 3.

In silico analysis of the mouse Smad3 gene and the upstream 5-kb region of the predicted promoter revealed no canonical retinoic acid response elements (RARE) by which RA could induce transcription by binding to the retinoic acid receptor: retinoid X receptor (RAR:RXR) heterodimer. Indeed, the promoters driving expression of Smad3 in mouse, rat, and humans are quite divergent, with the exception of large CpG islands (Figure 1C). These CG-rich regions are prone to methylation, and it has previously been demonstrated that the co-Smad Smad4 is silenced through this mechanism [33]. Methylation of the Smad3 promoter has also been demonstrated in humans [34]. Despite this, incorporation of 5-azacytidine (AZA), a methylation-resistant cytosine analog, failed to induce Smad3 expression despite significantly increasing Rarb expression, a RA target gene that is also regulated through a CpG island [35]. A 24-h treatment with AZA, however, failed to induce Smad3, suggesting that methylation of the CpG island is not the primary mode of regulation for Smad3 expression (Additional file 2: Figure S2 A,B). Published ChIP-seq data in which RAR occupancy of DNA elements in embryonic stem cells were mapped [GSM482750] confirmed that RARs do not occupy the promoter region of Smad3 in mice, but rather appear to occupy a site in the intron between exons 3 and 4 of the gene (Figure 1C). ChIP analysis of RAR occupancy of the putative intronic RARE revealed a significant 4-fold enrichment when compared to IgG controls in C2C12 myoblasts (Figure 1D), suggesting that occupancy of this site by RARs may play a role in the regulation of Smad3 expression by RA.

Treatment with retinoic acid rescues TGFβ-induced inhibition of myogenesis

TGFβ is a well-known reversible inhibitor of myogenesis [12-16,19]. In our experiments, when C2C12 myoblasts were treated with 1 ng/ml TGFβ, cell differentiation in low serum conditions was inhibited, with only a few small myosin heavy chain-expressing cells observed (Figure 2A). The differentiation index (#myonuclei/#total nuclei) of TGFβ-treated cells was reduced 90%, while the fusion index (#myonuclei/#myotubes) was reduced 63%, as compared to vehicle-treated cells (Figure 2B,C). In contrast, treatment with RA alone resulted in a modest but significant increase in differentiation, as compared to vehicle-treated cells (Figure 2A,B) [36-39]. Fusion was unaffected by treatment with RA (Figure 2C). When C2C12 myoblasts were treated with both RA and TGFβ, the differentiation index was partially restored to 55% of vehicle-treated cells (Figure 2A,B), while the fusion index was restored to vehicle-treated levels (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

Retinoic acid partially rescues the inhibition of myogenesis induced by TGFβ. (A) Representative images of C2C12 myoblasts differentiated in low serum conditions in the continual presence of RA or TGFβ as indicated or with vehicle (Veh) for 96 h and immunostained for myosin heavy chain (MyHC) expression. DAPI is used to reveal nuclei (blue). (B) Differentiation index (#myonuclei/#total nuclei) of C2C12 cells cultured and treated as in (A). Means indicated with the same letter are not statistically different from one another. Means with different letters are significantly different from one another with a P < 0.05, n = 3. (C) Fusion index (#myonuclei/#myotubes) of C2C12 cells cultured and treated as in (A). Calculations include mononucleated myosin heavy chain positive cells. Means with different letters are significantly different from one another with a P < 0.05, n = 3. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Smad3, Smad2, Pax7, and myogenic marker expression in C2C12 myoblasts treated and differentiated as in (A). Means with different letters are significantly different from one another with a P < 0.05, n = 3. (E) Western analysis of phosphorylated Smad2/3 (pSmad2/3) expression in C2C12 cells in growth conditions. Quantification by densitometry is represented as pSmad2 or pSmad3 relative to actin, respectively, n = 3, **P < 0.01, NS = not significant. Protein levels for Smad2 and Smad3 are shown.

To better understand the blockade of differentiation in TGFβ-treated cells, RT-qPCR analysis of mRNA expression in C2C12 myoblasts after 96 h in DM was performed (Figure 2D). RA treatment resulted in a significant increase in Smad3 and Myog expression, but did not affect the expression of Smad2, Pax7, Myf5, or Myod1 as compared to vehicle-treated controls (Figure 2D). By contrast, treatment with TGFβ significantly increased Pax7 and Myf5 expression, while decreasing Myod1 and Myog expression (Figure 2D), suggesting a blockade in differentiation in these cells. Smad3 and Smad2 mRNA expressions were not affected by TGFβ treatment at this time point (Figure 2D). Co-treatment with both TGFβ and RA significantly reduced Pax7 expression as compared to TGFβ treatment alone and restored Myog expression to the level of vehicle-treated controls, without affecting Myf5 or Myod1 levels (Figure 2D). Taken together, this data suggests that RA treatment can partially reverse the inhibitory effects of TGFβ on myoblasts.

Since the inhibition of C/EBPβ activities by Smad3 in preadipocytes and osteoblasts was mediated by Smad3 that was not phosphorylated on its C-terminal tail, as occurs with TGFβ treatment, we examined the classical Smad2/3 C-terminal serine phosphorylation sites in C2C12 myoblasts following a 24-h treatment with TGFβ and RA (Figure 2E). Western analysis to detect phospho-Smad2/3 revealed that while treatment with RA did not induce C-terminal phosphorylation of either Smad, treatment with TGFβ in the presence or absence of RA resulted in robust phosphorylation of the Smad3 S423 and S425 residues (Figure 2E). These results suggest that the effects of RA on TGFβ-mediated signaling are not due to changes in Smad3 phosphorylation status. However, in cells treated with both TGFβ and RA, we did detect a significant decrease in Smad2 phosphorylation of the equivalent residues without changes in Smad2 levels (Figure 2E), suggesting that RA may interfere with the actions of TGFβ by reducing Smad2 activation by phosphorylation.

TGFβ treatment of myoblasts stimulates C/EBPβ expression

Given that TGFβ treatment could enhance Pax7 expression in myoblasts and that Pax7 is a C/EBPβ target gene in myoblasts [31], we examined C/EBPβ expression levels in TGFβ and RA-treated cells. A 96-h TGFβ treatment of differentiating C2C12 myoblasts resulted in robust 8-fold increase in C/EBPβ expression (Figure 3A,B). TGFβ treatment also resulted in a 6-fold increase in Pax7 expression (Figure 3A,C). We next evaluated the effect of RA on C/EBPβ expression. While RA treatment did not change C/EBPβ expression, co-treatment with both TGFβ and RA under these conditions trended towards decreased C/EBPβ expression, but this failed to meet statistical significance when compared to TGFβ-treated cells (Figure 3D,E). RT-qPCR analysis revealed that while RA had no effect on Cebpb mRNA under differentiation conditions, TGFβ could upregulate Cebpb mRNA expression by approximately 2-fold under differentiation conditions, as compared to vehicle treatment, and this was prevented with TGFβ and RA co-treatment (Figure 3F). Taken together, these results suggest that C/EBPβ expression is regulated by TGFβ signaling and its expression can be inhibited by co-treatment with RA.
Figure 3

TGFβ treatment stimulates C/EBPβ expression in myoblasts. (A) Western analysis of C/EBPβ and Pax7 expression in C2C12 myoblasts cultured in differentiation medium in the presence or absence of TGFβ for 96 h. Actin is used as a loading control. (B) Quantification of C/EBPβ expression from western blots in panel (A) relative to vehicle-treated controls. Error bars are the SEM, n = 3, *P < 0.05. (C) Quantification of Pax7 expression from western blots from (A) relative to vehicle-treated controls. Error bars are the SEM, n = 3, **P < 0.01. (D) C/EBPβ protein expression after 96 h in differentiation medium (DM) in the continual presence of TGFβ and/or RA, as indicated. Actin is used as a loading control. (E) Quantification of western blots from (D) relative to the vehicle-treated controls. Error bars represent the SEM. Means marked with different letters are statistically different, meeting a minimum cutoff of P < 0.05, n = 4. (F) Cebpb mRNA expression in C2C12 myoblasts induced to differentiate in the presence or absence of TGFβ and RA for 96 h. Data is shown relative to vehicle-treated controls, and error bars are the SEM, n = 3. Means marked by different letters are statistically different from one another, meeting the minimum cutoff of P < 0.05.

RA interferes with C/EBPβ occupancy of target genes

One of the consequences of enhanced Smad3 nuclear expression in the absence of robust C-terminal phosphorylation in preadipocytes and mesenchymal stem cells is interference with the transcriptional activities of C/EBPβ [31]. We therefore predicted that RA treatment would decrease C/EBPβ occupancy of key target genes during myogenesis. We have previously demonstrated that Pax7 is a target gene of C/EBPβ in myoblasts and that C/EBPβ binds to a DNA response element in the Pax7 promoter [31]. To determine if RA promotes myogenesis by interfering with the activity of C/EBPβ, we performed a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay to evaluate C/EBPβ occupancy of the Pax7 promoter in C2C12 myoblasts. Since induction to differentiate rapidly reduces Pax7 expression, we treated C2C12 myoblasts for 24 h with RA in growth medium and analyzed C/EBPβ occupancy (Figure 4A). C/EBPβ was readily detected at the Pax7 promoter in vehicle-treated cells, and RA treatment significantly reduced the occupancy of C/EBPβ at its response element (Figure 4A). We repeated the ChIP in C2C12 myoblasts induced to differentiate for 24 h in the presence or absence of RA and found that RA treatment also decreased C/EBPβ occupancy of the Pax7 promoter as compared to vehicle-treated cells (Figure 4B).
Figure 4

RA interferes with C/EBPβ occupancy of target genes. (A) C/EBPβ occupancy of the Pax7 promoter in C2C12 myoblasts in GM after 24-h +/- RA. n = 3. (B) C/EBPβ occupancy of the Pax7 promoter in C2C12 myoblasts after 24-h in DM, +/-RA. n = 3. (C) Pax7 expression in C2C12 myoblasts after 24 h +/- RA in GM. n = 3. (D) Pax7 expression in C2C12 myoblasts after 24 h +/-RA in DM. n = 3. (E) Smad2/3 and C/EBPβ expression in C2C12 myoblasts retrovirally transduced to express C/EBPβ or with empty virus (pLXSN) +/- RA for 48 h in GM. Actin is the loading control. (F) Quantification of blots from (E); *P < 0.05, compared to vehicle-treated empty virus controls; **P < 0.01, compared to C/EBPβ-overexpressing vehicle-treated cells, n ≥ 3. (G) C/EBPβ expression in primary myoblasts from C/EBPβ conditional null (cKO) or control (WT) muscle in GM.. Quantification of three trials is indicated, with control set to 100, P < 0.05. (H) Smad2 expression in control (WT) and cKO myoblasts in GM. n = 3. (I) ChIP analysis of C/EBPβ occupancy of the Smad2 promoter in C2C12 myoblasts after 24-h +/- RA in GM. n = 3. (J) Smad2 expression in C2C12 myoblasts treated for 24 h +/-RA in GM. n = 3. (K) Smad2 expression in C2C12 myoblasts treated for 24 h +/-RA in DM. n = 3. (L) Cebpb expression in cells cultured as in (J). (M) Cebpb expression in cells cultured as in (K). n = 3. For all graphs, data is the mean +/- SEM. Means marked with different letters are statistically different from one another, meeting a minimum cutoff of P < 0.05. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. NS = non significant.

To correlate changes in occupancy with changes in gene expression, the expression of Pax7 was evaluated following a 24-h RA treatment under growth conditions (Figure 4C). Pax7 expression was unaffected by RA treatment in GM, a condition where C/EBPβ promoter occupancy was reduced. However, under differentiation conditions, RA treatment significantly reduced the expression of Pax7 (Figure 4D), suggesting that the regulation of Pax7 expression in growth medium is less dependent on the actions of C/EBPβ as compared to DM conditions.

Since TGFβ treatment increased C/EBPβ expression (Figure 3A), and persistent expression of C/EBPβ inhibits myogenic differentiation [31], we next examined the regulation of Smad2 and Smad3 in cells overexpressing C/EBPβ. We created pooled stable cell lines by retroviral transduction of C2C12 myoblasts to express C/EBPβ or empty virus control (pLXSN) and then treated the cells with RA for 48 h in growth medium (Figure 4E,F). RA treatment stimulated Smad3 expression in empty virus control cells and C/EBPβ-overexpressing cells (Figure 4E,F). Overexpression of C/EBPβ resulted in a stimulation of Smad2 expression that was reduced when cells were treated with RA (Figure 4E,F), suggesting that RA can interfere with Smad2 expression increased by C/EBPβ. Indeed, in primary myocytes isolated from a conditional null model in which C/EBPβ is excised in Pax7+ cells (Figure 4G), the mRNA expression of Smad2 was reduced by approximately 60% (Figure 4H). ChIP analysis revealed that C/EBPβ could occupy the Smad2 promoter in growth conditions (Figure 4I), and this occupancy was reduced to control IP levels by RA treatment, suggesting that RA treatment can also prevent C/EBPβ occupancy of the Smad2 promoter. The reduction in occupancy was accompanied by a significant decrease in Smad2 mRNA expression in RA-treated cells in both growth medium and under differentiation conditions (Figure 4J,K), indicating that Smad2 is a C/EBPβ target gene in this system, and raising the possibility that RA-upregulated Smad3 could prevent Smad2 upregulation and thereby promote myogenesis.

C/EBPβ can also autoregulate its expression [40-42]. Following a 24-h RA treatment under growth conditions, Cebpb expression was reduced, though not significantly (p < 0.06) (Figure 4L). However, under differentiation conditions, RA treatment significantly reduced the expression of Cebpb (Figure 4M), suggesting that RA treatment can decrease the expression of genes that inhibit myogenesis.

Inhibition of myogenesis by TGFβ is partially rescued by loss of C/EBPβ in myoblasts

Given that C/EBPβ expression is enhanced by TGFβ treatment, we hypothesized that TGFβ inhibits myogenic differentiation at least in part through the induction of C/EBPβ expression. We isolated primary myoblasts from a conditional knockout model (cKO; Cebpbfl/fl/Pax7CreER/+) and from control mice (WT; Cebpbfl/fl/Pax7+/+) and induced excision of Cebpb in cells expressing CreER with 4-OH tamoxifen. Primary myoblasts differentiate more rapidly than C2C12 myoblasts when exposed to low serum conditions, requiring a shorter time point for evaluation of differentiation. Myogenic differentiation was quantified using immunocytochemistry directed at myosin heavy chain in both WT and cKO cultures (Figure 5A). Vehicle-treated cKO myoblasts differentiated and fused similarly to WT controls (Figure 5A–C). The low dose of TGFβ used (5 ng/ml), however, decreased the number of myosin heavy chain positive cells in WT primary cells, decreasing the differentiation index by 67% as compared to vehicle-treated controls (Figure 5B). Of the TGFβ-treated WT cells that did differentiate, their fusion was severely compromised, with a fusion index (excluding mononuclear cells) reduced by 45% as compared to vehicle-treated controls (Figure 5C). The cKO primary myoblasts were less sensitive to the effects of TGFβ, with a differentiation index significantly higher than WT TGFβ-treated cells, but still distinct from controls (37% decrease as compared to vehicle-treated WT cells) (Figure 5B). The fusion of cKO cells treated with TGFβ, while trending towards restoration, was not statistically different from TGFβ-treated WT cells or vehicle-treated controls (Figure 5C), indicating a partial restoration of myogenesis with loss of C/EBPβ. Indeed, we have observed previously that the conditional loss of C/EBPβ can enhance myoblast fusion [31].
Figure 5

Inhibition of myogenesis by TGFβ is partially rescued by loss of C/EBPβ expression. (A) Representative images of myosin heavy chain expression by immunocytochemistry in primary myoblasts isolated from cKO or control (WT) mouse hindlimb and induced to differentiate in low serum for 48 h in the absence (veh) or presence of TGFβ treatment. (B) Differentiation indices (#myonuclei/#total nuclei) of cells cultured and treated as in (A). Means marked by different letters are statistically different from one another, with a minimum of P < 0.05, n = 3. Error bars represent the SEM (C) Fusion indices (#myonuclei/#myotubes) of cells cultured and treated as in (A). Counts exclude mononucleated myosin heavy chain positive cells. Error bars represent the SEM; means marked by different letters are statistically different from one another, meeting a minimum cutoff of P < 0.05, n = 3. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Smad2, Smad3, Cebpb, Pax7, and myogenic marker expression in primary myoblasts differentiated as in (A). Means with different letters are significantly different from one another with a P < 0.05, n ≥ 3. (E) Representative western blots of C/EBPβ, Smad2, Smad3, myogenin, and myosin heavy chain in primary myoblasts differentiated as in (A). Means with different letters are significantly different from one another with a P < 0.05, n = 5. (F) Quantification of C/EBPβ, Smad2, Smad3, myogenin, and myosin heavy chain protein expression from (E) relative to vehicle-treated WT control cells. Error bars are the SEM. Means marked with different letters are statistically different from one another, meeting a minimum cutoff of P < 0.05, n ≥ 3.

RT-qPCR analysis of myogenic gene expression was performed 48 h after induction to differentiate in the presence or absence of TGFβ in both WT and cKO cells (Figure 5D). TGFβ treatment decreased Smad3 expression, and this was not dependent on Cebpb expression. Smad2 expression was decreased with loss of C/EBPβ but was not affected by TGFβ treatment. Pax7 expression was increased by TGFβ treatment in WT cells, but was unaffected by loss of Cebpb expression. Both Myf5 and Myod1 were decreased by TGFβ treatment of WT cells, and this was not rescued by concomitant loss of Cebpb. Surprisingly, despite a partial rescue of the differentiation index, Myog expression was unchanged by TGFβ treatment and was unchanged in the cKO cells. Further, MyHC expression was, however, decreased by TGFβ treatment in cells of both genotypes. However, western analysis revealed that while the trends we observe at the mRNA level are preserved in protein expression for C/EBPβ and Smad3, myogenin protein expression is restored to control levels in TGFβ-treated cKO cells following differentiation, consistent with our differentiation assay results (Figure 5E,F). Further, myosin heavy chain expression was also increased in the TGFβ-treated cKOs as compared to the WTs though not restored to vehicle-treated levels, suggesting only a partial rescue of differentiation, which can be accounted for by the incomplete knockdown of C/EBPβ in the cKO cells. Smad2 protein levels were also not significantly affected by TGFβ treatment or loss of C/EBPβ expression at this time point, in contrast to changes in mRNA expression.

Taken together, these results suggest that TGFβ acts in part to inhibit myogenic differentiation through the actions of C/EBPβ, either through stimulation of its expression as observed in C2C12 myoblasts or by decreasing Smad3 expression, which is known to interact with and inhibit the DNA occupancy of C/EBPβ.

Discussion

Our results place the bzip transcription factor C/EBPβ as a mediator of TGFβ signaling in myoblasts (Figure 6). TGFβ treatment of C2C12 myoblasts stimulates C/EBPβ expression which in turn stimulates the expression of Pax7 and Smad2 as well as autoregulating itself in both growth and differentiation conditions. Indeed, C/EBPβ is known to regulate its own expression through binding to C/EBP elements in its promoter [40-42]. TGFβ treatment also decreased Smad3 expression, as was observed in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes, but this was not dependent on C/EBPβ [26]. Treatment with RA increased Smad3 levels in both growth and differentiation conditions, and decreased C/EBPβ occupancy of its target genes Pax7 and Smad2, resulting in a decrease in the expression of these factors and the stimulation of myogenesis. RA treatment also reduced the phosphorylation of Smad2 in TGFβ-treated cells without affecting Smad3 phosphorylation suggesting a second possible mechanism by which RA can promote myogenesis.
Figure 6

Proposed pro-myogenic role for retinoic acid and Smad3. The bzip transcription factor C/EBPβ is a potent inhibitor of myogenesis. It can stimulate the expression of Pax7 and Smad2 and can autoregulate its own expression. Regulation of Pax7 expression suppresses the myogenic differentiation of myoblasts, while the contribution of Smad2 remains unknown. TGFβ treatment can stimulate C/EBPβ expression during myogenic differentiation, and this contributes in part to the anti-myogenic effects of TGFβ treatment as loss of C/EBPβ partially restores differentiation in the presence of TGFβ. TGFβ can also, upon binding its receptor, stimulate the phosphorylation of both Smad2 and Smad3, and it is known that Smad3 can form inhibitory complexes with myogenic regulatory factors and inhibit myogenesis. Treatment with retinoic acid (RA) can antagonize the effects of TGFβ during myogenesis. In particular, RA can stimulate the expression of Smad3 which in turn associates with C/EBPβ and reduces its occupancy of target gene promoters, resulting in a reduction of their expression and the restoration of differentiation. RA treatment can also prevent the normal phosphorylation of Smad2 by the TGFβ receptor, without affecting Smad3 phosphorylation.

Despite robust upregulation of C/EBPβ expression in TGFβ-treated C2C12 myoblasts, and a role for C/EBPβ in the maintenance of Smad2 mRNA expression under growth conditions in primary myoblasts, we failed to observe a consistent upregulation of Smad2 or Cebpb expression by TGFβ in the primary myoblasts, while Pax7 was upregulated. Despite this, in primary myoblasts in which C/EBPβ expression was knocked down, differentiation was partially restored, suggesting that C/EBPβ is an important mediator of the anti-myogenic effects of TGFβ. In the absence of TGFβ treatment and in primary myoblasts, Smad2 expression is readily detectable and could transmit the effects of this signaling pathway independent of C/EBPβ. Indeed, the stimulation of C/EBPβ expression by TGFβ may serve to amplify the response to TGFβ, rather than to mediate it entirely. However, the partial rescue of differentiation suggests that TGFβ also exerts anti-myogenic effects via other mechanisms. While RA treatment restored fusion to control levels, loss of C/EBPβ alone was unable to do so, despite only partial restoration of differentiation in both models. These results suggest that TGFβ can act independently of C/EBPβ to inhibit myoblast fusion. Interestingly, of the proteins known to be implicated in the fusion of myoblasts, specifically ICAM-1, myomaker, Cdk16, and IL-4, none have promoter regions bound by C/EBPβ [43-47]. Further, the expression of myomaker and Cdk16, based on Chip-seq data, appears to be targets of MyoD and myogenin, and MyoD is known to be inhibited by activated Smad3, providing a non-C/EBPβ-dependent mechanism for the inhibition of fusion by TGFβ [12,13,48].

The formation of Smad3-containing inhibitory complexes with MEF2 and MyoD requires C-terminal phosphorylation of serines 423/425 of Smad3 by the liganded TGFβ receptor [12,13]. In RA-treated myoblasts, where Smad3 levels are increased but Smad3 remains dephosphorylated, myogenesis is potentiated and can antagonize the actions of TGFβ. As such, the phosphorylation of Smad3 by the TGFβ receptor may act as a switch trigger, toggling between the pro-myogenic actions of Smad3 in the absence of serine 423/425 phosphorylation and the anti-myogenic state when C-terminally phosphorylated. Indeed, RA treatment had no impact on Smad3 serine 423/425 phosphorylation in our experiments (Figure 2E). This model is consistent with the observation that loss of Smad3 in mice produced smaller muscle fiber diameter, impaired muscle regeneration following acute injury, and reduced satellite cell activation [20,21]. Further, ChIP-seq studies in embryonic stem cells and myoblasts have shown that upon TGFβ treatment, Smad3 co-occupies cell-specific DNA sites with master transcription factors Oct4 and MyoD, respectively, an activity that, in myoblasts, stands paradoxically in opposition to the biological impact of TGFβ in these cells [49]. However, if Smad3 has a pro-myogenic role, it could help prime cells for efficient differentiation by placing MyoD on target promoters. Further, a pro-myogenic role for Smad3 is consistent with our own studies which place RA-induced Smad3 as an important inhibitor of C/EBPβ transcriptional activities in both preadipocytes and mesenchymal stem cells, and an inhibitor of MyoD expression and activity in myoblasts [11,27,29,31].

Despite the absence of serine 423/425 phosphorylation in RA-treated myoblasts, it is possible that Smad3, in these cells, is alternatively phosphorylated or otherwise post-translationally modified following RA treatment. Indeed, numerous phosphorylation sites have been identified in the Smad3 linker region which can have an impact on Smad3 nuclear-cytoplasmic localization, stability and activity [50-54].

Therefore, it remains possible that in unspecified stem cells and in early myogenesis, when C/EBPβ levels are high and consequently MyoD levels are low, Smad3 expression can act to promote myogenesis at least in part through the inhibition of C/EBPβ activity (Figure 6). However, once C/EBPβ levels are downregulated, as they are in C2C12 myoblasts, and MyoD expression increases, Smad3 could become available to interfere with MyoD and MEF2-containing transcriptional complexes and exert an anti-myogenic role. As such, the inhibition of myogenesis by TGFβ may occur through at least two distinct pathways, one mediated by C/EBPβ and a second occurring downstream of myogenic regulatory factor activation.

Conclusions

We provide evidence that C/EBPβ is a non-canonical regulator of TGFβ signaling. TGFβ signaling stimulates C/EBPβ expression, which in turn increases Smad2 expression and Pax7 expression in myoblasts, inhibiting differentiation. Loss of C/EBPβ expression, or interference with C/EBPβ activity via RA treatment in myoblasts, resulted in a partial rescue of differentiation in the presence of TGFβ, suggesting that TGFβ works at least in part through C/EBPβ to inhibit myogenesis.

Abbreviations

C/EBPβ: 

CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta

RA: 

Retinoic acid

TGFβ: 

Transforming growth factor-beta

GM: 

Growth medium

DM: 

Differentiation medium

RARE: 

Retinoic acid response element

RAR: 

Retinoic acid receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). ÉL is supported by a Queen Elizabeth II graduate scholarship in science and technology (QEII - GSST). The human Smad3 promoter construct was kindly provided by Dr. Thomas Kelley at Case Western Reserve University. The authors wish to thank François Marchildon, Dr. Qiao Li, Dr. David Lohnes, and Dr. Alexandre Blais for their input. We benefitted from the use of several antibodies, listed in the “Methods” section, that were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa
(2)
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa

References

  1. Wrana JL, Attisano L, Wieser R, Ventura F, Massague J. Mechanism of activation of the TGF-beta receptor. Nature. 1994;370:341–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Laiho M, Weis MB, Massague J. Concomitant loss of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta receptor types I and II in TGF-beta-resistant cell mutants implicates both receptor types in signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:18518–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Heldin CH, Miyazono K, ten Dijke P. TGF-beta signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature. 1997;390:465–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Abdollah S, Macias-Silva M, Tsukazaki T, Hayashi H, Attisano L, Wrana JL. TbetaRI phosphorylation of Smad2 on Ser465 and Ser467 is required for Smad2-Smad4 complex formation and signaling. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:27678–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Macias-Silva M, Abdollah S, Hoodless PA, Pirone R, Attisano L, Wrana JL. MADR2 is a substrate of the TGFbeta receptor and its phosphorylation is required for nuclear accumulation and signaling. Cell. 1996;87:1215–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Souchelnytskyi S, Tamaki K, Engstrom U, Wernstedt C, ten Dijke P, Heldin CH. Phosphorylation of Ser465 and Ser467 in the C terminus of Smad2 mediates interaction with Smad4 and is required for transforming growth factor-beta signaling. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:28107–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee JY, Elmer HL, Ross KR, Kelley TJ. Isoprenoid-mediated control of SMAD3 expression in a cultured model of cystic fibrosis epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;31:234–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ross KR, Corey DA, Dunn JM, Kelley TJ. SMAD3 expression is regulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-1 in epithelial and smooth muscle cells. Cell Signal. 2007;19:923–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Xiao S, Jin H, Korn T, Liu SM, Oukka M, Lim B, et al. Retinoic acid increases Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and inhibits development of Th17 cells by enhancing TGF-beta-driven Smad3 signaling and inhibiting IL-6 and IL-23 receptor expression. J Immunol. 2008;181:2277–84.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Marchildon F, St-Louis C, Akter R, Roodman V, Wiper-Bergeron NL. Transcription factor Smad3 is required for the inhibition of adipogenesis by retinoic acid. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:13274–84.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu D, Black BL, Derynck R. TGF-beta inhibits muscle differentiation through functional repression of myogenic transcription factors by Smad3. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2950–66.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu D, Kang JS, Derynck R. TGF-beta-activated Smad3 represses MEF2-dependent transcription in myogenic differentiation. EMBO J. 2004;23:1557–66.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Massague J, Cheifetz S, Endo T, Nadal-Ginard B. Type beta transforming growth factor is an inhibitor of myogenic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:8206–10.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miyake T, Alli NS, McDermott JC. Nuclear function of Smad7 promotes myogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:722–35.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Olson E, Sternberg E, Hu J, Spizz G, Wilcox C. Regulation of myogenic differentiation by type beta transforming growth factor. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:1799–805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu Q, Kopp JB. Retinoid and TGF-beta families: crosstalk in development, neoplasia, immunity, and tissue repair. Semin Nephrol. 2012;32:287–94.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang X, Letterio J, Lechleider R, Chen L, Hayman R, Gu H, et al. Targeted disruption of SMAD3 results in impaired mucosal immunity and diminished T cell responsiveness to TGF-beta. EMBO J. 1999;18:1280–91.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhu S, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Dong C. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced inhibition of myogenesis is mediated through Smad pathway and is modulated by microtubule dynamic stability. Circ Res. 2004;94:617–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ge X, McFarlane C, Vajjala A, Lokireddy S, Ng Z, Tan C, et al. Smad3 signaling is required for satellite cell function and myogenic differentiation of myoblasts. Cell Res. 2011;21:1591–604.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ge X, Vajjala A, McFarlane C, Wahli W, Sharma M, Kambadur R. Lack of Smad3 signaling leads to impaired skeletal muscle regeneration. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;303:E90–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Phanish MK, Wahab NA, Colville-Nash P, Hendry BM, Dockrell MEC. The differential role of Smad2 and Smad3 in the regulation of pro-fibrotic TGFbeta1 responses in human proximal-tubule epithelial cells. Biochem J. 2006;393:601–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng XM, Huang XR, Chung AC, Qin W, Shao X, Igarashi P, et al. Smad2 protects against TGF-beta/Smad3-mediated renal fibrosis. JASN. 2010;21:1477–87.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sakaki-Yumoto M, Liu J, Ramalho-Santos M, Yoshida N, Derynck R. Smad2 is essential for maintenance of the human and mouse primed pluripotent stem cell state. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:18546–60.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ungefroren H, Groth S, Sebens S, Lehnert H, Gieseler F, Fändrich FC. Differential roles of Smad2 and Smad3 in the regulation of TGF-β1-mediated growth inhibition and cell migration in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells: control by Rac1. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:67.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Baugé C, Cauvard O, Leclercq S, Galéra P, Boumédiene K. Modulation of transforming growth factor beta signalling pathway genes by transforming growth factor beta in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes: involvement of Sp1 in both early and late response cells to transforming growth factor beta. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R23.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dingwall M, Marchildon F, Gunanayagam A, Louis CS, Wiper-Bergeron N. Retinoic acid-induced Smad3 expression is required for the induction of osteoblastogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Differentiation. 2011;82:57–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiper-Bergeron N, Salem HA, Tomlinson JJ, Wu D, Hache RJ. Glucocorticoid-stimulated preadipocyte differentiation is mediated through acetylation of C/EBPbeta by GCN5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:2703–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wiper-Bergeron N, St-Louis C, Lee JM. CCAAT/Enhancer binding protein beta abrogates retinoic acid-induced osteoblast differentiation via repression of Runx2 transcription. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:2124–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiper-Bergeron N, Wu D, Pope L, Schild-Poulter C, Hache RJ. Stimulation of preadipocyte differentiation by steroid through targeting of an HDAC1 complex. EMBO J. 2003;22:2135–45.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchildon F, Lala N, Li G, St-Louis C, Lamothe D, Keller C, et al. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta is expressed in satellite cells and controls myogenesis. Stem Cells. 2012;30:2619–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Aitchison AA, Veerakumarasivam A, Vias M, Kumar R, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, et al. Promoter methylation correlates with reduced Smad4 expression in advanced prostate cancer. Prostate. 2008;68:661–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Busque L, Belisle C, Provost S, Giroux M, Perreault C. Differential expression of SMAD3 transcripts is not regulated by cis-acting genetic elements but has a gender specificity. Genes Immun. 2009;10:192–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Di Croce L, Raker VA, Corsaro M, Fazi F, Fanelli M, Faretta M, et al. Methyltransferase recruitment and DNA hypermethylation of target promoters by an oncogenic transcription factor. Science. 2002;295:1079–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu G-H, Huang J, Bi Y, Su Y, Tang Y, He B-C, et al. Activation of RXR and RAR signaling promotes myogenic differentiation of myoblastic C2C12 cells. Differentiation. 2009;78:195–204.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Krueger C, Hoffmann FM. Identification of retinoic acid in a high content screen for agents that overcome the anti-myogenic effect of TGF-beta-1. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15511.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan T, Liu J, Chu A, Wang L, Blais A, Skerjanc I. Retinoic acid enhances skeletal myogenesis in human embryonic stem cells by expanding the premyogenic progenitor population. Stem Cell Rev. 2012;8:482–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kennedy K, Porter T, Mehta V, Ryan S, Price F, Peshdary V, et al. Retinoic acid enhances skeletal muscle progenitor formation and bypasses inhibition by bone morphogenetic protein 4 but not dominant negative beta-catenin. BMC Biol. 2009;7:67.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mink S, Jaswal S, Burk O, Klempnauer KH. The v-Myb oncoprotein activates C/EBPbeta expression by stimulating an autoregulatory loop at the C/EBPbeta promoter. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1447:175–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pal R, Janz M, Galson DL, Gries M, Li S, Johrens K, et al. C/EBPbeta regulates transcription factors critical for proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2009;114:3890–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Niehof M, Kubicka S, Zender L, Manns MP, Trautwein C. Autoregulation enables different pathways to control CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBP beta) transcription. J Mol Biol. 2001;309:855–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Horsley V, Jansen KM, Mills ST, Pavlath GK. IL-4 acts as a myoblast recruitment factor during mammalian muscle growth. Cell. 2003;113:483–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shimizu K, Uematsu A, Imai Y, Sawasaki T. Pctaire1/Cdk16 promotes skeletal myogenesis by inducing myoblast migration and fusion. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:3030–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Millay DP, Sutherland LB, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. Myomaker is essential for muscle regeneration. Genes Dev. 2014;28:1641–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Goh Q, Dearth CL, Corbett JT, Pierre P, Chadee DN, Pizza FX. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression by skeletal muscle cells augments myogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 2015;331(2):292–308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Shin N-YY, Choi H, Neff L, Wu Y, Saito H, Ferguson SM, et al. Dynamin and endocytosis are required for the fusion of osteoclasts and myoblasts. J Cell Biol. 2014;207:73–89.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kent W, Sugnet C, Furey T, Roskin K, Pringle T, Zahler A, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996–1006.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mullen AC, Orlando DA, Newman JJ, Loven J, Kumar RM, Bilodeau S, et al. Master transcription factors determine cell-type-specific responses to TGF-beta signaling. Cell. 2011;147:565–76.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sapkota G, Knockaert M, Alarcón C, Montalvo E, Brivanlou A, Massagué J. Dephosphorylation of the linker regions of Smad1 and Smad2/3 by small C-terminal domain phosphatases has distinct outcomes for bone morphogenetic protein and transforming growth factor-beta pathways. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:40412–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kamato D, Burch M, Piva T, Rezaei H, Rostam M, Xu S, et al. Transforming growth factor-β signalling: role and consequences of Smad linker region phosphorylation. Cell Signal. 2013;25:2017–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Matsuzaki K. Smad phosphoisoform signaling specificity: the right place at the right time. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:1578–88.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Matsuzaki K, Kitano C, Murata M, Sekimoto G, Yoshida K, Uemura Y, et al. Smad2 and Smad3 phosphorylated at both linker and COOH-terminal regions transmit malignant TGF-beta signal in later stages of human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5321–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Mori S, Matsuzaki K, Yoshida K, Furukawa F, Tahashi Y, Yamagata H, et al. TGF-beta and HGF transmit the signals through JNK-dependent Smad2/3 phosphorylation at the linker regions. Oncogene. 2004;23:7416–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lamarche et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement