Open Access

Akt-mediated phosphorylation controls the activity of the Y-box protein MSY3 in skeletal muscle

  • Luciana De Angelis1,
  • Sreeram Balasubramanian2 and
  • Libera Berghella3Email author
Skeletal Muscle20155:18

DOI: 10.1186/s13395-015-0043-9

Received: 20 February 2015

Accepted: 29 April 2015

Published: 29 May 2015

Abstract

Background

The Y-box protein MSY3/Csda represses myogenin transcription in skeletal muscle by binding a highly conserved cis-acting DNA element located just upstream of the myogenin minimal promoter (myogHCE). It is not known how this MSY3 activity is controlled in skeletal muscle. In this study, we provide multiple lines of evidence showing that the post-translational phosphorylation of MSY3 by Akt kinase modulates the MSY3 repression of myogenin.

Methods

Skeletal muscle and myogenic C2C12 cells were used to study the effects of MSY3 phosphorylation in vivo and in vitro on its sub-cellular localization and activity, by blocking the IGF1/PI3K/Akt pathway, by Akt depletion and over-expression, and by mutating potential MSY3 phosphorylation sites.

Results

We observed that, as skeletal muscle progressed from perinatal to postnatal and adult developmental stages, MSY3 protein became gradually dephosphorylated and accumulated in the nucleus. This correlated well with the reduction of phosphorylated active Akt. In C2C12 myogenic cells, blocking the IGF1/PI3K/Akt pathway using LY294002 inhibitor reduced MSY3 phosphorylation levels resulting in its accumulation in the nuclei. Knocking down Akt expression increased the amount of dephosphorylated MSY3 and reduced myogenin expression and muscle differentiation. MSY3 phosphorylation by Akt in vitro impaired its binding at the MyogHCE element, while blocking Akt increased MSY3 binding activity. While Akt over-expression rescued myogenin expression in MSY3 overexpressing myogenic cells, ablation of the Akt substrate, (Ser126 located in the MSY3 cold shock domain) promoted MSY3 accumulation in the nucleus and abolished this rescue. Furthermore, forced expression of Akt in adult skeletal muscle induced MSY3 phosphorylation and myogenin derepression.

Conclusions

These results support the hypothesis that MSY3 phosphorylation by Akt interferes with MSY3 repression of myogenin circuit activity during muscle development. This study highlights a previously undescribed Akt-mediated signaling pathway involved in the repression of myogenin expression in myogenic cells and in mature muscle. Given the significance of myogenin regulation in adult muscle, the Akt/MSY3/myogenin regulatory circuit is a potential therapeutic target to counteract muscle degenerative disease.

Keywords

MSY3 Csda Transcription factor Akt Myogenin Muscle differentiation Postnatal muscle

Background

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) myogenic regulatory factors coordinate the correct function and organization of many skeletal muscle functions. These require precise control both at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. Among the myogenic bHLH factors, myogenin is crucial in the embryo, in fetal and in adult life, due to its many functions in regulating skeletal muscle growth, maturation and metabolism [110]. Although it has been reported that multiple mechanisms control myogenin in postnatal muscle [1115], the signaling that specifically controls myogenin expression levels in adult skeletal muscle is not yet fully known. We have previously shown that MSY3/Csda binds a highly conserved cis-acting element located upstream of the myogenin promoter (myogHCE) and regulates the postnatal down-regulation of myogenin [16].

MSY3 (MSY4, YB-2, CSDA, dbpA, ZONAB) is a member of the cold shock domain (CSD) family of proteins also known as Y-box proteins, which are evolutionarily conserved proteins that function as transcription factors and regulators of RNA metabolism and protein synthesis. Y-box proteins act via diverse mechanisms, as they work by DNA binding and non-DNA binding mechanisms. Moreover, they bind single-stranded DNA and RNA and are involved in both gene repression and activation [1720]. MSY3 is a DNA binding protein, which acts as a transcriptional repressor. It has been extensively studied in tissues where it is highly expressed, including skeletal muscle where two isoforms of MSY3 (long and short), which differ by a single exon, are present [16, 2123]. Possible MSY3 mechanisms of action have been studied in cell culture studies. In particular, in fibroblasts MSY3 represses VEGF expression by preferentially binding single-stranded sense DNA of the hypoxia responsive region (HRR) of the VEGF promoter [24]; it regulates proliferation and density in epithelial cells, by shuttling between the tight junction and the nucleus, where it regulates the expression of cell cycle progression genes [2527]. It is also upregulated in epithelial cancers and promotes proliferation in neoplastic cells [28, 29]. Although it is highly expressed in skeletal muscle and heart, very little is known about the role of MSY3 in the muscle gene regulatory network. In skeletal muscle we showed that MSY3 binds, in vitro and in vivo, the myogHCE sequence, a conserved regulatory module located upstream of the myogenin promoter and specifically regulates myogenin expression [16]. Additionally, myogHCE deletion analyzed using reporter transgenic mice, led to a persistence of myogenin expression along the muscle fiber during the period of muscle maturation [16]. These results show that both MSY3 and the myogHCE play a crucial role in myogenin down-regulation that occurs during the refinement of synaptogenesis, when AChR expression becomes restricted at synaptical sites in the muscle fiber [30, 31].

Akt (or protein kinase B (PKB)) is a family of versatile serine/threonine kinases (Akt1, Akt2, and Akt3). They play a pivotal role in numerous biological processes, such as cell growth, proliferation and survival, and human diseases such as cancer and type 2 diabetes. Upon its activation, which involves tyrosine kinase receptors and signaling events, Akt binds and phosphorylates a wide range of transcription factors altering their sub-cellular localization and thus leading to their activation or inhibition [3234]. Multiple findings indicate that Y-box protein signaling involves the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway, which modulates their activity mainly by regulating their translocation between nucleus and cytoplasm [24, 29, 3538]. PI3K signaling pathway is essential for skeletal muscle growth during development and regeneration after injury regulating myoblast proliferation and fusion, muscle gene expression, and post-mitotic growth of myotubes [39, 40]. In adult muscle, the Akt signaling cascade controls loss of muscle mass by inhibiting protein degradation through phosphorylation and inactivation of the FoxO family of transcription factors [41, 42]. Akt is also activated during adaptive and IGF-induced myotube hypertrophy and can prevent loss of muscle mass by promoting protein synthesis through the activation of the mTOR pathway [4345]. Numerous direct and indirect substrates of the PI3K pathway have been characterized in skeletal muscle: key regulatory proteins involved in translation and protein synthesis, effectors of protein degradation such as ubiquitin ligases and also transcription factors and chromatin remodeling complexes involved in skeletal muscle differentiation and growth [39, 40, 4655].

During muscle maturation, MSY3 becomes dephosphorylated and accumulates in the nuclei of muscle fibers and represses myogenin [16]. This correlates with myogenin down-regulation observed as muscle proceeds through advanced stages of postnatal life. Given the role of MSY3 in skeletal muscle differentiation and Akt’s capacity to regulate Y-box protein activity, we asked if the PI3K pathway controls MSY3 activity to repress myogenin during muscle differentiation and in adult life. In this study, by using specific inhibitors of the PI3K pathway, we showed that Akt phosphorylates the MSY3 CSD in myogenic cells and subsequently MSY3 is sequestered in the cytoplasm. Phosphorylation by Akt and subsequent cytoplasmic translocation of MSY3 results in derepression of myogenin, which is required for progression of differentiation. Akt over-expression in adult muscle induces MSY3 phosphorylation and upregulates myogenin expression. These findings in the C2C12 cell culture system and postnatal and mature muscle correlate with myogenin down-regulation observed as muscle proceeds throughout advanced stages of postnatal life. Furthermore, they suggest a role for Akt in modulating, through MSY3 phosphorylation, myogenin activity in adult skeletal muscle function.

Methods

Cell, treatments, transfections, and RNA interference

C2C12 cells (ATCC) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 20 % FBS (growth medium (GM)) and induced to differentiate with DMEM supplemented with 2 % HS (differentiation medium (DM)). SB203580, LY294002 and Rapamycin were purchased from Calbiochem. Wortmannin, PD98059, KN-62 and KN-93 were purchased from Sigma. Transfections of C2C12 cells were performed with FuGene reagent (Roche). To generate and maintain stable clones, selection of C2C12 cells was performed with G418 at a concentration of 400 μg/ml and puromycin at 2 μg/ml. Gene expression was determined by qRT-PCR as described previously [16]. Down-regulation of Akt1 and Akt2 by RNA interference was achieved as previously described [55].

Immunofluorescence

C2C12 cells were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde (10 min at 4 °C) and then treated with 0.15 % Triton X-100 in PBS for 5′ at RT. After re-hydration with PBS, they were blocked with 10 % NGS for 1 h at RT and then processed for immunofluorescence (IF) with an MSY3 rabbit antiserum ZONAB (Zymed) [56], diluted 1:100 in 1.5 % normal goat serum in PBS followed by Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen). For FLAG IF, a mouse anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma) was used at the dilution of 1:400, followed by Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (Invitrogen) incubation. Also mouse anti-MHC (MF20) (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) and rabbit anti-histoneH3 (Sigma) were used. IF images were exported in Tiff format, and fluorescence intensities in the nuclear and cytoplasmic regions were quantified using ImageJ. Background-corrected N/C ratios were calculated from mean fluorescence intensities measured within a small square or circular region of interest placed within the nucleus, cytoplasm, and outside of each cell. Due to LY294002 effects on proliferation, measurements on LY 80 % (Fig 3) were performed only in those areas where the cells reached confluence. Cross sections of limbs of 2-day-aged pups (2 pn) and TA of 1-month-aged mice (1 M) were fixed in methanol for 10 min at −20 °C and then treated with 0.2 % Triton X-100 in PBS for 5′ at RT. After re-hydration with PBS, they were blocked with 4 % BSA for 1 h at RT and then processed for immunofluorescence (IF) with ZONAB, diluted 1:100, and mouse anti-caveolin 3 (BD), diluted 1:500, in 4 % BSA-PBS followed by Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen).

Immunoblot analysis and immunoprecipitation

Nuclear and cytosolic protein extracts from C2C12 cells and from skeletal muscle were isolated with the Nuclear Extract Kit (Active Motif). Proteins were fractionated by electrophoresis on 10 % Novex Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gel (Life Technologies). For MSY3 phosphorylation analysis, 8 % Novex Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gels were used (Life Technologies). They were electroblotted to nitrocellulose membrane and reacted with rabbit anti-MSY3 (ZONAB) (Life Technologies), mouse anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma), mouse anti-α − tubulin and mouse anti-GAPDH (Sigma-Aldrich), mouse anti-myogenin (FD5, IOWA Hybridoma bank), anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473), and anti-Akt (Cell Signaling). Immunoreactivity was determined using the ECL method (Life Technologies) with the reagents provided according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Densitometry calculations were done by measurements of band intensities using ImageJ, verifying for background and non-saturation. Values are expressed as the integrals (area*means density) of each band (normalized to weakest band).

For immunoprecipitation (IP), protein extracts (50 μg) from skeletal muscle (8 and 15 pn) isolated as described above, were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 2.5 μg of anti-MSY3 Ab, ZONAB, previously coated to Dynabeads® M-280 Sheep anti-Rabbit IgG (Life Technologies). The immunocomplexes were analyzed by Western blot as described above, together with not immunoprecipitated extract (Input) and unconjugated IgG.

Protein dephosphorylation assay

Forty micrograms of extracts were incubated with different amounts of Antarctic Phosphatase (Roche), in the presence of its reaction buffer 10× for 30 min at 37 °C and directly analyzed or immunoprecipitated and analyzed by Western blot as described above.

Plasmids

The MSY3FLAG and mutated forms were generated by PCR amplification from the parental pcDNA3-MSY3 HA plasmid (16) and then cloned in frame in the N-p3XFLAG-CMV vector using the following oligos: FLAGFOR 5′GAATTCGAGCGAGGCGGGCGAGGCCACC 3′; FLAGREV 5′TCTAGACGGTGCCTGGGAGCCAGGGTC 3′. GST-MSY3 fusion proteins were generated as previously described [16].

Preparation of recombinant and nuclear protein and gel shift analysis

EMSA experiments were performed according to protocols previously described [16]. Reactions were analyzed on 8 % non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel.

Analysis of phosphorylated recombinant CSD protein

The Escherichia coli strain BL21 transformed with pGST-MSY3 was induced with isopropyl-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside to produce recombinant GSTMSY3 protein. The fusion proteins were purified on glutathione-sepharose beads as described by the manufacturer (Promega). Phosphorylation of MSY3 was determined by incubating 50 ng of recombinant GSTMSY3 protein with Akt and GSK3β active proteins (Upstate), in a mixture containing 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 5 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5 and 50 μCi [γ 32P] ATP in an in vitro phosphorylation assay. Kinase reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min, and 32P labeled proteins were examined by 12 % SDS/PAGE and detected after exposure of gels to X-ray films. For preparation of cold kinase proteins, kinase reactions were performed by incubation with or without active Akt and GSK3β, in presence of 0.5 mM ATP.

Site-directed mutagenesis

The FLAGMSY3 mutant constructs Ser126Ala and Ser328Ala were synthesized and sequenced by GenScript Corporation (Piscataway, NJ, USA; www.genscript.com).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

ChIP in C2C12 cells was performed as previously described [16], and in adult muscle, the following modifications were introduced: 100 mg of TA from an adult mouse (3-month-aged 3MM) was dissected 7 days post-electroporation, minced, and then fixed with 1 % formaldehyde for 15 min. After fixation, glycine was added to a final concentration of 0.125 M. The tissue was then homogenized in PBS using the Micro-Dismembrator U (Sartorius). Nuclei were collected in lysis buffer and sonicated. The average size of the fragments was approximately 400 bp. We used 2 μg of anti-ZONAB/MSY3 (Life Technologies) and qRT-PCR was performed as described above. Primers used for amplification were as follows: myogenin promoter Forward 5′-CCCTGCCCCACAGGGGCTGTG-3′ Reverse 5′-ACGCCACAGAAACCTGAGCCC-3′; IGH enhancer Forward 5’-GCCGATCAGAACCAGAACACCTGC-3′Reverse 5′-TGGTGGGGCTGGACAGAGTGTTTC-3′.

In vivo electroporation

Animal experiments were conducted after approval from the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee (IACUC) at California Institute of Technology, (protocol n.1565). TA muscle was electroporated as previously described [16]. Expression vectors were injected with a 0.5-m insulin syringe through a 27-gauge needle into the TA muscles of 3MM C57BL6 mice (20 μg of myristoylated Akt expressing vector or pcDNA3 in a constant volume of 20 μl of PBS).

Results

MSY3 is progressively dephosphorylated as skeletal muscle matures

We previously demonstrated that MSY3 protein expression progressively increased as muscle matures, from late stages of fetal development (15 dpc) to the mature stages of muscle growth in postnatal life (2 months old, 2MM). A Western blot analysis showed that the migration pattern of MSY3 protein (long isoform) shifts from a multi-band to a single lower molecular weight band in the nuclear extract of leg muscle, between very early stages of postnatal development (8 pn) and later stages (15 pn) [16]. We interpreted this modification as a result of the protein phosphorylation state change. We analyzed the MSY3 protein-banding pattern from 6–15 days postnatal extracts and inferred the time of shift from a multi-band to a single band migration pattern around the ninth day of postnatal life (Fig. 1a). During progression from fetal to adult stages, myogenin expression is severely reduced along the muscle fiber, as described previously [30, 57], and shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1. To investigate whether this change in MSY3 migration pattern is caused by the loss of a phosphate group, we incubated protein extracts from limbs of 16 dpc embryos with Antarctic Phosphatase (AP). Upon treatment with AP, MSY3 protein migrated as a single band compared to the multiple bands observed in the untreated sample (Fig. 1b), suggesting that MSY3 is phosphorylated during muscle development. Analysis of MSY3 immunoprecipitated protein from skeletal muscle extracts of 8 pn and 15 pn mice showed the same migration observed in skeletal muscle (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). Treatment of the immunoprecipitated MSY3 protein with AP affected its migration pattern similar to the input control (non-immunoprecipitated) MSY3 protein (Additional file 1: Figure S2B).
Fig. 1

MSY3 is progressively dephosphorylated and accumulates in the nuclei in skeletal muscle after birth. a Left: Western blot with anti-MSY3 (ZONAB) protein extracts of limb and TA muscle at different postnatal days (pn). α-tubulin was used as normalizer. Right: densitometry calculations for MSY3 faster (dephosph) and slower (phosph) migration bands of the Western blot on the left, normalized by α-tubulin. Figure displays results representative from three independent experiments. *P <0.01 by Student’s t test. b Western blot with extracts from 15 dpc embryo limbs treated with Antarctic Phosphatase (AP), 1 unit and 5 units, and probed with anti-MSY3 Ab (ZONAB). c Western blots of nuclear and cytosolic fractions of protein extracts of limb muscle at fetal (15 dpc), postnatal (pn), and mature, 1 month (1 M), stages. Histone H3 was used as normalizer of the nucleic fraction and GAPDH as normalizer of the cytosolic fraction. d Left: expression of MSY3 evaluated by IF with anti-MSY3 Ab, ZONAB, in cross sections of limbs of 2-day-aged pups (2 pn) and TA of 1-month-aged mice (1 M). The images merge MSY3 expression (red), caveolin 3 expression (green), and Hoechst nuclei staining (blue). MSY3 localization in nuclei is labeled in purple. Scale bars = 100 μm. On the right, high magnification images (corresponding to dotted white squares) show staining of few muscle fibers. Scale bar = 40 μm. White arrows indicate sporadic MSY3 nuclear accumulation in 2 pn limb cross sections. Right Graph quantifies MSY3 positive nuclei over the total nuclei in cross sections of limbs of 2-day-aged pups (2 pn) and TA of 1-month-aged mice (1 M)

We then asked if the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of MSY3 protein segregated in different compartments of muscle fibers throughout perinatal and mature developmental stages. Translocation from nucleus to the cytoplasm and consequent activation is indeed the main effect of phosphorylation on many transcription factors including Y-box proteins [29, 36, 58]. By nuclei-cytosol fractionation, we observed that the dephosphorylated MSY3 protein progressively accumulates in the nuclei of muscle fibers from fetal and perinatal stages to mature developmental stages (1 month old, 1 M). During the same time, we observed a corresponding reduction in the phosphorylated form of MSY3 in the cytosol (Fig. 1c). Using IF, we observed nuclear MSY3 protein accumulation in TA cross sections of younger (2 pn) and adult mice (1 month old, 1 M). The images show much more MSY3 localization in the adult muscle fibers as compared to the nuclei of muscle fibers of younger mice (Fig. 1d; Additional file 1: Figure S3). An estimation of the MSY3 positive-stained nuclei in both stages revealed 68 % of total nuclei in adult fibers as MSY3 positive while only a few interstitial nuclei (10 % of total) in the younger fibers were positive for MSY3 (Fig. 1d; Additional file 1: Figure S3). However, due to technical difficulties, we could not substantiate expression in the cytosolic fraction of the fibers as shown by the nuclei-cytosol fractionation shown in Fig. 1c. In adult muscle fiber, MSY3 expression is detectable in almost all the myonuclei and other sub-laminal and interstitial cells (Fig. 1d). Our results indicate that dephosphorylated MSY3 migrates progressively in the nucleus as the muscle grows and matures. MSY3 dephosphorylation and segregation in the nuclei occurs concomitantly with myogenin down-regulation. In retrospect, these data support the hypothesis that phosphorylation and subsequent localization of MSY3 in the cytoplasm is responsible for modulating MSY3 activity as a repressor of myogenin expression.

MSY3 is phosphorylated by Akt in C2C12 cells

In order to determine the mechanism responsible for MSY3 phosphorylation in skeletal muscle, we analyzed MSY3 protein expression and migration patterns in C2C12 myogenic cells by Western blot analysis. MSY3 protein (long isoform), detected with the polyclonal antibody ZONAB, is expressed at the same levels in proliferating (GM) and differentiated for 48 h (DM) C2C12 cells (Fig. 2a). We observed that MSY3 migrates as multiple forms in both conditions, GM and DM. Also, densitometry measurements of untreated extracts show that the dephosphorylated form of MSY3 is more prominent in myoblasts (GM) than in myotubes (DM) (Fig. 2a). After in vitro treatment of C2C12 extracts with AP, MSY3 protein shifted to a single faster migrating form. This indicates that both phosphorylated and the dephosphorylated forms of MSY3 are present in C2C12 myogenic cells (Fig. 2a). We then tested the effects of LY294002 (LY), an inhibitor of the PI3K/Akt pathway that also inhibits myogenin expression and myogenic differentiation [52, 55], on MSY3 phosphorylation in vivo (Additional file 1: Figure S4A, B). Treatment with LY reduced MSY3 basal phosphorylation in C2C12 myoblasts (Fig. 2b). However, we observed that the highest concentration of LY tested (30 μM) resulted in a pronounced reduction of MSY3 expression. We observed no changes in the MSY3 protein phosphorylated/dephosphorylated ratio when C2C12 cells were treated with other kinase inhibitors, involved in muscle differentiation or hypertrophy such as p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) inhibitor (SB203580), mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor (PD98059), or calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMKII) inhibitors (KN-62; KN-93) (Additional file 1: Figure S4A, B, D, E). Inhibition of the IGF1/PI3K/Akt pathway upstream of Akt by treatment with the PI3K pathway inhibitor, wortmannin, showed a reduction in MSY3 phosphorylation (Additional file 1: Figure S4C). In addition, treatment with rapamycin, the mTOR inhibitor that blocks the PI3K pathways downstream of Akt, did not alter the ratio of phosphorylated/dephosphorylated MSY3 protein (Additional file 1: Figure S4C), although both wortmannin and rapamycin inhibit myogenic differentiation (Additional file 1: Figure S4A). The observation that only the PI3K inhibitor altered the phosphorylated/dephosphorylated MSY3 levels argues for a role for Akt in phosphorylating the Y-box protein MSY3 in myogenic cells. This conclusion is in agreement with the previously documented role of Akt in phosphorylating and regulating functions of Y-box proteins in other cell types [29, 35, 38].
Fig. 2

MSY3 is phosphorylated by Akt in C2C12. a Left: multi-band migration pattern is shown in the Western blot with protein extracts of C2C12 myoblasts (GM) and myotubes (DM) treated with 1 unit of Antarctic Phosphatase (AP), probed with anti-MSY3 Ab (ZONAB). α-tubulin was used as normalizer. Right: densitometry calculations for faster (dephosph) and slower (phosph) migration bands of the Western blot on the left, normalized by α-tubulin. b Left: Western blot probed with anti-MSY3 Ab (ZONAB) and anti-myogenin Ab with protein extracts of C2C12 myoblasts (GM) treated with two different (20 μM and 30 μM) concentrations of LY294002 (LY). α-tubulin was used as normalizer. Right: densitometry calculations for faster (dephosph) and slower (phosph) migration bands of the Western blot on the left, normalized by α-tubulin. c Left: immunoblot with an anti-Akt total, an anti-MSY3 and anti-myogenin Abs in protein extracts of C2C12 grown in DM for 36 h, transfected with scrambled RNAi oligos (Ki) and RNA interfering oligos against of Akt 1 and Akt 2 (Akti), demonstrates that Akt activity is responsible for MSY3 phosphorylation. Right: densitometry calculations for Akt, myogenin, and MSY3 faster (dephosph) and slower (phosph) migration bands of the Western blot on the left, normalized by α-tubulin. We estimated a reduction of Akt of 75 %. Figure displays results representative from three independent RNAi experiments. Akt P <0.01; MSY3 dephosph P <0.05; MSY3 phosph P <0.01; myogenin P <0.05 by Student’s t test

To demonstrate that Akt is responsible for MSY3 phosphorylation, we knocked down Akt1 and Akt2 expression by RNA interference in C2C12 cells, since both kinases are involved in regulating the myogenic program [54, 59, 60]. Upon reduction of Akt expression, estimated at 75 %, we observed a strong decrease in the amount of the phosphorylated MSY3 protein (Fig. 2c). We also observed a concomitant reduction of myogenin protein expression (Fig. 2c) and an impairment of myogenic differentiation (Additional file 1: Figure S4F). Based on these data, we hypothesize that Akt is responsible for MSY3 phosphorylation in myogenic cells and through MSY3 plays an indirect role in regulating myogenin activity.

Dephosphorylated MSY3 accumulates in C2C12 nuclei

Although MSY3 is a nucleic acid binding protein, in epithelial cells, it is sequestered in the cytosol by a tight junction-associated protein, ZO-1, which controls its accumulation and activity as a transcription factor in the nuclei [25]. This suggests that sub-cellular localization of MSY3 is a possible mechanism for regulating MSY3 functions. Phosphorylation by Akt is a requirement for initiating sub-cellular trafficking of many Akt targets, including the Y-box proteins [29, 36]. To investigate the role of Akt in MSY3 intracellular distribution in myogenic cells, we treated proliferating (GM) and differentiated C2C12 cells (DM) with the Akt inhibitor LY and detected MSY3 protein localization by IF with ZONAB. Fluorescence images of untreated C2C12 cells showed that MSY3 is not localized in the nuclei and is dispersed in the cytoplasm, both in myoblasts and myotubes, with some exceptions of selective nuclear localization (0.1 %, white arrow in Additional file 1: Figure S5A). To examine MSY3 localization in more detail, we quantified the extent of fluorescence observed in the cytoplasm and nucleus from confocal sections and calculated the nuclear/cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio for 60–80 cells across five independent experiments (Fig. 3c). This analysis showed that, although a high variability exists in the N/C ratio across different experiments in untreated cells, MSY3 preferentially localized in the cytosol or was equivalently distributed between nucleus and cytosol. Additionally, MSY3 localization is independent from cell confluence, since similar N/C ratios were observed in proliferating cells at 30 and 80 % of confluency (Fig. 3c). After LY treatment, we observed a robust MSY3 accumulation in the nucleus both in proliferating and differentiated cells (Fig. 3a, c and Additional file 1: Figure S5A). A higher magnification (60×) of the IF shows that in a low percentage of the nuclei MSY3 protein is completely depleted (Fig. 3b). When C2C12 cells were treated with LY in DM, myogenesis was inhibited and mono-nucleated cells with MSY3 localized in the nuclei were observed. Although, in some cases, we observed small myotubes with diffuse MSY3 staining (in nucleus and cytoplasm) (green arrow in Additional file 1: Figure S5A). We analyzed the distribution of phosphorylated and dephosphorylated MSY3 in the nuclear (N) and (C) cytoplasmic compartments in untreated and LY treated C2C12 myoblasts by Western blot. In concordance with the IF observations, densitometry measurements showed that phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of MSY3 protein were distributed equally between the nuclei and cytoplasm in untreated myoblasts and upon LY treatment the nuclei were enriched for the dephosphorylated form (Fig. 3d and Additional file 1: Figure S5B). These results demonstrate that Akt phosphorylation inhibited by PI3K/Akt pharmacological blockade induces a robust accumulation of dephosphorylated MSY3 in the nuclei of myogenic cells. In the nucleus, dephosphorylated MSY3 acts as a transcriptional repressor of differentiation promoting genes, such as myogenin.
Fig. 3

Dephosphorylated MSY3 accumulates in C2C12 nuclei. a Expression of MSY3 evaluated by IF with anti-MSY3 Ab, ZONAB, in C2C12 myoblasts in proliferating (30 % confluence) (IF left) and confluent (80 % confluence) growth (IF right) upon LY294002 (LY) treatment. Scale bar = 200 μm. b High magnification image (60×) of MSY3 expression (top) and Hoechst nuclei staining (bottom) in C2C12 myoblasts untreated (−) and upon LY treatment (LY). Scale bar = 60 μm. c N/C ratios of MSY3 signal in C2C12 myoblasts untreated (−) and upon LY treatment (+), evaluated as a mean ± DS for 60–80 cells from a total of five independent experiments. Quantification was performed as described in the “Methods” section. *P <0.05 by Student’s t test. d Densitometry calculations for MSY3 faster (dephosph) and slower (phosph) migration bands in nuclear (N) and cytosolic (C) compartments in untreated (−) and upon LY treatment (+), analyzed on Western blots performed as that shown in Fig S2B. Figure displays results representative from three independent RNAi experiments. *P <0.01; **P <0.001 by Student’s t test

Akt phosphorylates MSY3 and reduces its binding to myogHCE in vitro

To determine if MSY3 is a downstream phospho-substrate for Akt in vitro, we constructed a GST-MSY3 fusion construct with GST at the N-terminal end and tested the ability of Akt and GSK3β, another kinase regulated by the PI3K pathway [47], to phosphorylate MSY3, in an in vitro kinase assay (Fig. 4a). We observed that a phospho protein with the same molecular weight as GST-MSY3 (Comassie staining lanes 3–4) is present only when the GST-MSY3 protein (but not GST alone) is incubated with Akt (Fig. 4a lanes 7–8) but not when it is incubated with GSK3β (Fig. 4a, lanes 11–12). This evidence confirms that MSY3 is specifically phosphorylated by Akt in myogenic cells. MSY3 represses myogenin by binding the highly conserved DNA cis-acting element located upstream of the myogenin promoter (myogHCE) (Fig. 4b) [16]. To analyze the functional impact of MSY3 phosphorylation, we tested if the binding of MSY3 to the myogHCE regulative element in vitro is modulated by the Akt phosphorylation of MSY3. The GST-MSY3 protein binds efficiently to the WT myogHCE oligo, (MYOwt) but to a lesser extent to the mutated oligo (MYOmutL) as expected [16] in a gel shift assay (Fig. 4c, lanes 2–3). We observed that when MSY3 is phosphorylated in vitro by Akt, its binding at the myogHCE (MYOwt) element is reduced more than 50 %, while phosphorylation by GSK3β showed no effects on binding (Fig. 4c, lanes 4–7). This result indicates that MSY3 phosphorylation by Akt shows a moderate but specific effect on the DNA binding property of the MSY3 recombinant protein.
Fig. 4

Akt phosphorylates MSY3 and reduces its binding to myogHCE in vitro. a Phosphorylation of MSY3 by Akt. GST-MSY3 (*) was phosphorylated by Akt, (lanes 7 and 8) but not by GSK3β (11 12). Auto-phosphorylated Akt protein (°) and GSK3β (§) are present. The Comassie gel is shown (lanes 1–4). For each sample, there are two experimental replicates. b Schematic of the myogenic locus. This diagram describes the myogenin promoter (the 130 bp upstream region from the TSS) and the genomic alignments of six vertebrates. The schematic also shows the relative locations of myogHCE element—the region to which MSY3 binds and other well-known motifs (myogHCE-brown, MEF3box-light blue, MEF2box-green, TATA box-purple, and E-box-yellow. MyogHCE is MSY3 binding site [16]; MEF3box is Dach2 binding site [13]; MEF2box is MEF2/HDAC9 binding site [12]. c MSY3 phosphorylation by Akt impairs its binding at the myogenin promoter. Sequences of MyogHCE (MYOwt) and mutant myogHCE (MYOmutL) oligonucleotides used in EMSA are shown. Mutant MYOmutL disrupts the myogHCE sequence, which incudes the MSY3 site. Mobility shift assay (EMSA) of GST-MSY3 binding to EMSA assay of GST and GSTMSY3 fusion protein with myogHCE (MYOwt) and mutant myogHCE (MYOmutL) 32P labeled oligonucleotide in double-strand form without (first three lanes) and with prior treatment by Akt (lanes 4 and 5) and by GSK3β (lanes 6 and 7)

Akt phosphorylates MSY3 in C2C12 cells, decreasing its binding activity and increasing myogenin expression

In order to further assess if Akt phosphorylation of MSY3 interferes with its binding of myogHCE in vivo, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on proliferating (GM) and differentiated C2C12 cells (DM) treated with the PI3K inhibitor LY, using the anti-MSY3 Ab ZONAB. ChIP on proliferating C2C12 myoblasts treated with LY showed a modest enrichment for MSY3 at the myogenin promoter compared to untreated myoblasts. In comparison, C2C12 myotubes treated with LY showed an increased enrichment when compared to their untreated counterparts (Fig. 5a). This evidence suggests that Akt inactivation results in increased levels of dephosphorylated MSY3, which in turn leads to increased MSY3 binding at the myogenin promoter region.
Fig. 5

Akt phosphorylates MSY3 in C2C12 cells, decreasing its binding activity and increasing myogenin expression. a Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis for control IgG and MSY3 antibodies used individually to enrich fixed chromatin from undifferentiated (GM) or differentiated (DM) C2C12 cells, treated (+) or not (−) with LY2940002 (LY). qRT-PCR is used to quantify sequences from the myogenin promoter. b Measurements of endogenous myogenin expression by qRT-PCR in mock transfected C2C12 (−MSY3, −Akt) and MSY3 over-expressing C2C12 multiclones transfected (+MSY3, +Akt) or not (+MSY3, −Akt) with myristoylated Akt in proliferation medium (GM) or upon different times cultured in differentiation medium (24–72–96 h DM). GAPDH was used to normalize expression levels

We also wanted to determine if Akt over-expression could rescue forced MSY3 repression of myogenin in C2C12 myoblasts and myotubes. To test this, we transfected MSY3 over-expressing C2C12 pools with a plasmid expressing the constitutively active form of Akt (myristoylated Akt) [61] and measured myogenin expression at multiple differentiation timepoints. Upon Akt expression, we observed modest levels of myogenin expression at 24 h post-differentiation, which increased to levels comparable to WT C2C12 cells at later stages of differentiation (72–96 h) (Fig. 5b). These results indicate that forced Akt expression reduces the amount of dephosphorylated MSY3 found in the nucleus during forced expression, thereby reducing its repressive activity on myogenin expression in myogenic cells.

Identification of Ser126 as the target for Akt phosphorylation that alters MSY3 nuclear/cytoplasmic trafficking and function in myogenic cells

In order to map the putative Akt phosphorylation sites, we generated FLAG-tagged WT and mutant MSY3 constructs, carrying deletions of the domains showed in Fig. 6a: CSD, alternative splicing domain (SHORT) and the carboxy (RP-CD) domain, which includes the arginine and proline-rich conserved domain and the C-terminal proline-rich domain. We introduced these constructs by transient transfection in C2C12 myoblasts and analyzed the migration of their protein products. FLAGMSY3 WT protein migrated as double bands, as expected. Treatment with AP reduced phosphorylation levels of the FLAGMSY3 WT protein similar to the endogenous MSY3 protein (Additional file 1: Figure S6). Among the mutations assayed, only the FLAG∆CSD showed a strong reduction of the upper band, indicating that the phosphorylation site responsible for MSY3 phosphorylation in C2C12 cells is located in the CSD domain (Fig. 6b). It is known that the Akt phosphorylation site in YB-1 and MSY3 in non-muscle cells was identified in the CSD. This region is highly conserved among the cold-shock protein family and is responsible for the nucleus-cytoplasmic shuttling [29, 36, 62]. In our model, we also identified the CSD as the domain responsible for the nucleus-cytoplasm trafficking. While the FLAG∆CSD protein localized exclusively in the nucleus in myoblasts, the FLAGMSY3 and the other mutated forms localized predominantly in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6c). An accurate analysis of IF (white arrow in Fig. 6c) and distribution of phosphorylated and dephosphorylated MSY3 in the nuclear (N) and (C) cytoplasmic compartments (Fig. 6d), also revealed that the deletion of the C-terminal-domain (RP-CD) induced a partial accumulation of the FLAGΔRP-CD in the nuclei. This modest nuclear migration of FLAGΔRP-CD protein suggests that the MSY3 RP-CD domain is at least partially responsible for MSY3 nucleus-cytoplasmic trafficking. For instance, it could contain another phosphorylation target, as indicated by the residual presence of the slower (phosphorylated) band in the CSD mutant (Fig. 6b).
Fig. 6

Deletion of CSD alters MSY3 nuclear/cytoplasmatic trafficking in myogenic cells. a Graphic illustration of the deleted MSY3 protein domains tested in the mutagenesis assay and distribution of the Akt phosphorylation consensus sites in the MSY3 protein. b Western blot with anti-FLAG Ab of protein extract of C2C12 cells transiently transfected with a FLAG-tagged MSY3 protein (FLAGMSY3) and FLAG-tagged MSY3 protein deleted of the cold shock (FLAGΔCSD), splicing alternative (FLAGΔSHORT), and the carboxy (FLAGΔRP-CD) domains. c FLAG expression tested by IF with an anti-FLAG Ab in C2C12 myoblasts transiently transfected with FLAGMSY3, FLAGΔCSD, FLAGΔSHORT, and FLAGΔRP-CD proteins. The white arrow indicates a nuclear FLAG signal of the FLAGΔRP-CD protein. Scale bar = 100 μm. d N/C ratios of FLAG signal in C2C12 transfected with FLAGMSY3, FLAGΔCSD, FLAGΔSHORT, FLAGΔRP-CD, FLAGSer126Ala, and FLAGSer328Ala proteins, evaluated as a mean ± DS for 60–80 cells from a total of three independent experiments. Quantification was performed as described in Methods. e Akt phosphorylation consensus sites in the MSY3 protein

While searching for Akt phosphorylation consensus sequences in the MSY3 protein, we did not find any site matching the minimal requirements for the Akt consensus site RXRXXS/T [63]. However, a PhosphoSitePlus scan of the MSY3 sequence [64] highlighted several low stringency putative sites that could potentially be phosphorylated by Akt (Fig. 6e). Among these we focused on two candidate amino acids, Serine126 and Serine 328, located in the CSD and RP-CD domains, respectively. MSY3-Ser126, located in the CSD, corresponds to Ser102 of the MSY3 human homolog protein YB-1. Moreover, MSY3Ser126 was shown to be phosphorylated by Akt in leukemia cell lines [29]. It has been previously demonstrated that activated Akt phosphorylates YB-1 at Ser102, affecting its nuclear translocation and function in cancer cells [36, 37].

We mutated the Serine 126 and 328 residues to Alanine in order to remove the side chain substrates and thus prevent phosphorylation by Akt. Two mutated MSY-3 constructs (MSY3 Ser126Ala) and (MSY3 Ser328Ala) were constructed and cloned in FLAG tagged vectors and were transiently expressed in C2C12 myoblasts. Nuclear accumulation of the anti-FLAG signal was observed only in myoblasts transfected with the MSY3-S126A but not myoblasts transfected with the MSY3-S328A construct. This result demonstrates that Ser126 and not Ser328 is the phosphorylation substrate responsible for the nuclear trafficking of MSY3 (Fig. 7a). Also, only Ser126A migrated as a single band, similar to the CSD mutation, providing further evidence that the substrate responsible for MSY3 phosphorylation in C2C12 is Ser126.
Fig. 7

Disruption of Akt substrate Ser126 alters MSY3 nuclear/cytoplasmatic trafficking and function in myogenic cells. a Top: FLAG expression in C2C12 myoblasts transiently transfected with FLAG-tagged MSY3 proteins mutated at Ser126 (FLAGSer126Ala) and at Ser 328 (FLAGSer328Ala). Scale bar = 150 μm. Bottom: Western blot with anti-FLAG Ab of protein extracts of C2C12 transiently transfected with FLAG-tagged MSY3 protein (FLAGMSY3), FLAGSer126Ala and FLAGSer328Ala. b Measurements of myogenin expression by qRT-PCR in myrsAkt transfected C2C12 multiclones expressing FLAG MSY3, FLAGΔCSD, and FLAGSer126Ala transfected with myristoylated Akt (Akt) in proliferation medium (GM) or upon different times cultured in differentiation medium (24–72 h DM). GAPDH was used to normalize expression levels

We wanted to further determine if Akt over-expression was able to rescue endogenous myogenin expression in the presence of the MSY3 mutants (∆CSD and Ser126A) in C2C12 myoblasts and myotubes. We transfected mock N-p3XFLAG-CMV and FLAGΔCSD and FLAGSer126Ala expressing cell pools with myristoylated Akt and measured endogenous myogenin expression levels by qRT-PCR in growth and differentiation conditions (Fig. 7b). In the myristoylated-Akt transfected cell pools expressing MSY3 mutant constructs, endogenous myogenin is strongly reduced relative to those expressing MSY3 WT. These results demonstrate that the CSD and specifically Ser126, in the CSD, mediate Akt phosphorylation of MSY3 and impair its repression of myogenin.

Forced phosphorylation of MSY3 in skeletal muscle tissue abolishes its binding activity at the myogenin promoter

Our next step was to determine if Akt was able to regulate MSY3 phosphorylation and activity in mature skeletal muscle, as observed in myogenic cells. To answer this question, we forced Akt expression in muscle fibers by electroporating a TA muscle of an adult mouse (3 months old, 3MM), with a myristoylated Akt construct (myrsAkt) or a control plasmid (pcDNA3, mock). Phosphorylated Akt is present at very low levels in adult muscle, since it is dephosphorylated as muscle matures (Fig. 8a). When myristoylated, Akt is over-expressed in muscle and phosphorylates MSY3, as demonstrated by the shift in the MSY3 protein migration pattern (Fig. 8b). We also detected a slight increase in myogenin expression under this condition (Fig. 8b).
Fig. 8

Forced phosphorylation of MSY3 in skeletal muscle tissue abolishes its binding activity at the myogenin promoter. a Western blot with anti-phospho and anti-total Akt of protein extracts of limb and TA muscle isolated at different developmental stages, fetal (dpc), and post-natal days (pn) and mature 1 month (1 M). b Western blot with anti-MSY3 Ab (ZONAB), anti-phospho-Akt, and anti-myogenin of protein extracts of TA muscle, electroporated with a mock expression plasmid pcDNA3 (mock) and with myristoylated Akt (Akt). Three replicates from three independent electroporations are shown in lanes 1, 2, 3 and lanes 5, 6, 7. Normalizer is α-tubulin. c Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis for control IgG and MSY3 antibodies used individually to enrich fixed chromatin from TA electroporated with a mock expression plasmid (M) and with myristoylated Akt (Akt). Replicates from three independent electroporations are shown for mock plasmid electroporation (M1, M2, M3) and for myristoylated Akt (Akt1, Akt2, Akt3). qRT-PCR is used to quantify sequences from the myogenin promoter

Next, we determined if this forced MSY3 phosphorylation, mediated by constitutive Akt over-expression, impaired its binding at the myogenin promoter in mature muscle. To test this, we performed ChIP with ZONAB on TA muscle electroporated with myrsAkt. We observed that, indeed, this forced phosphorylation of MSY3 reduced its occupancy at the myogenin promoter in adult muscle (Fig. 8c), leading to myogenin up-regulation. These data suggest that MSY3 can be phosphorylated by Akt in adult muscle (as observed in myogenic cells in vitro) and as a consequence both its DNA binding activity and thereby its function as a repressor, are impaired.

Discussion

Dephosphorylation regulates MSY3 activity in adult muscle

In skeletal muscle, a fine-tuned regulation of myogenin expression is required. Muscle functionality depends on the correct regulation of this muscle regulatory factor, from the earlier stages of development until maturity, in normal and in pathological conditions. In Berghella et al. [16], we proposed a new regulatory pathway, which involves the Y-box protein MSY3/Csda as a negative regulator of myogenin expression in adult muscle. This study further suggested that muscle functions in postnatal life, in which myogenin plays a determinant role, are under the partial control of MSY3. The signaling pathway that influences MSY3 activity of myogenin regulation from birth to adulthood is not known [16].

During the progression from fetal to postnatal life and to late stages of muscle maturation, the phosphorylation state of the MSY3 long isoform changed, precisely during the second week after birth. Around this time, we saw a progressive reduction in myogenin expression. Therefore, the gradual MSY3 dephosphorylation correlates with a progressive down-regulation of myogenin. This concurrence strongly supports our hypothesis that MSY3 acts as a repressor when it is dephosphorylated. In the same time window, we also observed a progressive induction of both the long and short MSY3 isoforms, although in this study we did not explore the mechanisms responsible for MSY3 transcriptional regulation. The MSY3 short isoform does not have the sixth exon but retains the intact CSD domain. Unlike the long isoform, the MSY3 short isoform did not show a high rate of phosphorylation compared to the long isoform and seems to be regulated only at the transcriptional level [16]. Hence in this study, we focused only on the phosphorylation of the long isoform. However, a more accurate analysis will establish if technical reasons prevented the detection of the phosphorylated MSY3 short isoform. Phosphorylation has been described as the main post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism of the Y-box proteins. Indeed, they are targets for different signaling pathways mediated by protein kinases, which modulate or silence Y-box protein function as transcriptional repressors. In this context, ERK2/MAPK and PI3K/Akt are the most well-described pathways, the former in increasing the Y-box binding at their targets, and the latter in inhibiting it [24, 29, 3538]. In this study, we focused on the PI3K/Akt pathway, which we demonstrated is responsible for MSY3 phosphorylation and inhibition of its activity as a repressor of myogenic gene expression and myogenic differentiation in adult muscle. We do not exclude the hypothesis that other phosphorylation pathways, also mediated by phosphatase proteins, may influence MSY3 function in different stages of skeletal muscle development. For instance, it has been recently reported that serine/threonine protein phosphatase type-1 (PP1) associates with the cold shock domain of MSY3 [65].

Akt regulates myogenin expression and myogenesis by MSY3 phosphorylation

In the present work, we discovered a signaling mechanism linking the PI3K/Akt pathway to regulation of myogenin expression through phosphorylation of MSY3. Analysis of the MSY3 protein migration pattern by Western blot, from differentiating C2C12 myogenic cells, showed an increase in the phosphorylated MSY3 long isoform. This shift was coincidental with the myogenin expression increase and completion of myogenic differentiation. From our previous studies, we know that MSY3 binds the myogHCE in the myogenin promoter and represses myogenin expression in only proliferating and undifferentiated C2C12 myoblasts and not in myotubes. Moreover, knocking-down MSY3 expression in myoblasts induced myogenin expression [16]. Our present study suggests that in order to allow myogenin expression, MSY3 needs to be inactive and its phosphorylation can be one of the mechanisms by which its function is inhibited in differentiated muscle. Also, MSY3 is strongly expressed in the limbs of developing embryos [66]. At this stage MSY3 is phosphorylated and myogenin is highly expressed in somites and in limbs. Based on these data, we postulate that when MSY3 is phosphorylated, it is inactive as a repressor and is predominantly sequestered in the cytoplasm, thus allowing myogenin expression.

Multiple reports suggest that Y-box proteins are regulated through Akt/PKB-mediated phosphorylation of the cold shock domain, which is responsible for their regulatory activity at the transcription and translation level. Phosphorylation by Akt, indeed, impairs the inhibitory activity of the MSY3 homolog, MSY1 (YB-1), and of MSY3 (YB-2) on oncogenesis progression [29, 3638]. So, we asked if Akt could also control MSY3 phosphorylation in skeletal muscle. We showed that treatment of C2C12 cells with the P13K/Akt specific inhibitor, LY294002 (LY), reduced the phosphorylated MSY3 fraction, both in proliferating and differentiated myogenic cells. siRNA-mediated depletion of Akt has the same effect, suggesting a role for Akt in modulating MSY3 activity during muscle differentiation. In a cell culture myogenic system, we demonstrated that silencing Akt reduced phosphorylated MSY3 levels and concomitantly myogenin expression and muscle differentiation. We showed, using a kinase assay, that Akt directly and specifically phosphorylates recombinant MSY3 in vitro. While MSY3 might be a GSK3β target since it contains potential GSK3β sites in the CSD, in our assay it is not phosphorylated by recombinant GSK3β, in agreement with previous results [24]. Upon phosphorylation by Akt, MSY3’s ability to bind its consensus binding site (myogHCE) on the myogenin promoter in vitro is impaired, suggesting a partial role for Akt phosphorylation in destabilizing the MSY3-myogenin promoter binding complex formation. Moreover, when Akt activity is blocked by treatment with LY in differentiating C2C12 cells, MSY3 is able to bind myogHCE, and represses myogenin expression, but not in untreated C2C12 cells. Additionally, over-expression of the myristoylated form of Akt restored myogenin expression in MSY3 over-expressing myotubes. Altogether, these results demonstrate that MSY3 phosphorylation by Akt ensures correct progression of muscle differentiation, by regulating myogenin expression. When MSY3 is phosphorylated, its affinity for myogHCE is reduced and it is sequestered in the cytoplasm. Cytoplasmic sequestration then allows the transcription regulatory factors Pbx and MyoD to access the MSY3 consensus site, thus promoting chromatin opening and gene activation, according to the model proposed previously [16, 67].

A role of Y-box protein in myogenic differentiation has also been described previously for YB-1 (MSY1), as a negative regulator of MyoD expression by binding to the MyoD core enhancer, cooperatively with a transcriptional repressor, Msx-1 [68]. Moreover, initial evidence that MyoD might also be directly affected by MSY3 was previously reported, indicating that both MyoD and myogenin are modulated by the same repressor complex [16]. We consider the appealing possibility that Akt could regulate the nuclear localization of a group of Y-box proteins, which in turn target myogenic genes, sequestering them in the cytoplasm thus promoting muscle differentiation.

Several studies have explained how the PI3K/Akt pathway affects muscle differentiation through different mechanisms: by phosphorylation and activation of transcription factors (MyoD) and cofactors (MEF2) or of different components of the muscle transcriptosome (acetyltransferases, p300, and pCAF), or of proteins that regulate terminal differentiation and myotube hypertrophy [47, 55]. In this study, we propose that the Akt/MSY3/myogenin signaling cascade acts as a promyogenic negative regulatory circuit that proceeds in parallel with the other positive regulatory pathways controlled by Akt during muscle differentiation. Hence based on our findings, PI3K/Akt signaling not only promotes myogenesis but also actively avoids repression of muscle differentiation. Previous studies have shown that Akt-mediated phosphorylation in other contexts can directly or indirectly block the activity of negative regulators of transcription such as C/EBPα or the Polycomb group protein Bmi1 to promote cell proliferation or tumor growth [69, 70]. Moreover, PI3K/Akt pathway inactivation results in the conversion of chromatin from permissive to repressive, as demonstrated by association of the Polycomb-associated methyltransferase Ezh2 or in an association of MEF2 with myogenesis inhibitors (Ezh2 and HDAC4) instead of myogenesis activators [55]. Our data suggests a new mechanism of action by which the PI3K/Akt pathway prevents myogenic differentiation. Ultimately, Akt acts by direct phosphorylation and inactivation of a class of negative regulators of muscle differentiation, the Y-box proteins.

Akt phosphorylation regulates MSY3 nuclei/cytosol translocation

The underlying mechanism of action mediated by Akt phosphorylation to exert its function often affects the substrate sub-cellular trafficking [34, 54]. In cases such as FOXO, Akt phosphorylation dictates exclusion of the phosphorylated transcription factors from the nuclei, leading to inhibition of their transcriptional regulatory activity [32]. Altering sub-cellular localization is also the manner in which Akt-mediated phosphorylation modulates Y-box protein functions. Several lines of evidence show that Y-box proteins act as transcriptional regulators of genes involved in proliferation and differentiation, when they translocate to the nucleus and as regulators of translation or different functions, when they are in the cytoplasm [36, 37, 62, 71]. We observed that inhibiting Akt activity by LY treatment, deleting the CSD, and mutating the Akt phosphorylation site at Ser126 in the CSD induced MSY3 protein migration from the cytoplasm to the C2C12 myogenic cell nucleus. Although both Ser126 and Ser328 residues are low stringency predicted Akt targets compared to the Akt consensus site (RXRXXS/T), the Ser126 site is conserved among vertebrates from human to zebrafish. This region also falls into the highly conserved CSD domain of the Y-box protein, which is responsible for binding DNA. This could explain why among the two putative sites, Ser126 is the substrate for Akt phosphorylation in MSY3, thus responsible for its nuclear to cytoplasmic migration. Deletion of the C-domain (ΔRP-CD) induced a partial migration of flagged MSY3 protein in the nuclei, but was confirmed not to be due to the ablation of the putative Akt phosphorylation site Ser328. It is possible that the partial migration might have been a result of the deletion of a region within RP-CD, responsible for intracellular trafficking or for the conformation and stability of the protein. Nevertheless, we did not analyze other Akt putative target sites located in the RP-CD that could account for the partial nuclear migration observed. Although, we identified the Akt phosphorylation substrate in MSY3 partially responsible for its nuclear-cytoplasm translocation, we have yet to determine the mechanism and the players involved in its subsequent subcellular trafficking. As muscle fibers mature, MSY3 shifts from the phosphorylated to the dephosphorylated form and translocates from the cytosol to the nuclei, and coincidently, phosphorylated active Akt is reduced. These results lead us to believe that the same mechanism of Akt-mediated phosphorylation of MSY3, determined in myogenic cell culture, is active during muscle development. We also postulate that the MSY3 nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling observed in postnatal muscle is correlated to its function in repressing myogenin and other possible targets involved in muscle maturation and growth.

Function of Akt/MSY3 regulatory circuit in adult muscle

The most well-documented role of Akt in skeletal muscle is to induce hypertrophy in muscle fibers and maintain muscle mass during development, by controlling protein synthesis in muscle fibers, by promoting proliferation and activation of muscle satellite cells, and by counteracting atrophy [39, 40]. The negative control exerted by Akt on MSY3 function as a repressor could be crucial during perinatal and early postnatal life, when skeletal muscle grows dramatically and concomitantly with increased body mass. Contrarily, upon maturity, when skeletal muscle achieves the right size and it needs to be maintained, Akt-mediated phosphorylation of MSY3 is reversed and it is employed in silencing its target genes. Myogenin is down-regulated in adult and unperturbed myofibers. When we forced Akt expression in adult muscle fibers, we observed phosphorylation of MSY3 protein with a subsequent over-expression of myogenin. The phosphorylated MSY3 showed reduced occupancy at the myogenin promoter thereby allowing myogenin reactivation. Forced Akt expression was confined to muscle fibers and not observed in satellite cells, and it was accompanied by an increase of muscle fiber size (data not shown) as already described [44, 72]. This evidence suggests that the Akt/MSY3 regulatory axis may be involved in a possible mechanism to control muscle size within myofibers. It is possible that upon phosphorylation, MSY3 binding of other genomic targets required for skeletal muscle growth and maturation is also impaired. This is plausible considering that myogenin deletion in early postnatal life does not affect skeletal muscle growth [4], and Akt/MSY3 might control mechanisms independent of myogenin in this context. Further genome-wide studies on MSY3 occupancy will address this point.

In our previous work, we proposed a role of MSY3/Csda in neuromuscular junction (NMJ) development occurring during skeletal muscle innervation due to its inhibitory action on myogenin, which positively activates AChRs along muscle fibers [16]. Other mechanisms have been described that respond to nerve signals in order to down-regulate myogenin and involve transcriptional repressors [12, 13, 31]. As Akt regulates MSY3 function, it is likely that the PI3K/Akt pathway participates in nerve-mediated signaling, occurring during motor innervation. Nevertheless, a link between nerve activity and Akt activation has not been described yet. It has been well described how Akt activation can be promoted by intracellular calcium increase [73, 74], although the signaling cascade that precedes the dephosphorylation of MSY3 in mature muscle and whether other MRFs are involved in this timed process is currently unknown. Additionally, it is possible that other post-translational modifications of the MSY3 protein could act in order to connect electrical activity of the nerve to myogenin via MSY3.

In adult life, myogenin is reinduced following injuries in satellite cells or upon resection of the sciatic nerve (denervation) in muscle fibers [57, 75]. The PI3K signaling pathway plays an active role in response to regeneration of damaged muscle. In satellite cells, Akt promotes muscle gene expression and terminal differentiation through different cooperating targets [55, 76, 77]. It is plausible that the Akt/MSY3/myogenin regulatory circuit drives myogenesis in satellite cells upon injury and thus contributes to muscle fiber growth through mechanisms mediated by satellite cells.

Some studies showed that when denervation is induced in muscle, active pAkt and total Akt are significantly and unexpectedly up-regulated [78]. The reason for Akt activation still remains unknown, although it can be explained as a compensatory effect to counteract denervation-induced muscle atrophy. Indeed, constitutively active Akt can inhibit neurogenic atrophy [43]. Additionally, we have previously shown that MSY3 protein levels start to decrease upon denervation followed by an increase in myogenin and Myod expression levels. Conversely, it was shown that forced expression of MSY3 (electroporated) in denervated muscle led to a knockdown of myogenin, Myod, and α AChR expressions with no effect on MCK and AChR expressions [16]. When reactivated, Akt could phosphorylate MSY3 and hence promote myogenin or other MSY3 targets derepression upon nerve section. In this study, we did not explore the downstream effects of Akt over-expression in muscle fibers, although using transgenic models over-expressing Akt will help elucidate the role of the Akt/MSY3 regulatory circuit in the conditions when myogenin is re-expressed.

Conclusions

Altogether, these results propose a new mechanism of action for the PI3K/Akt pathway in controlling myogenic differentiation and possibly adult muscle function by direct phosphorylation of MSY3. In a myogenic cell culture model, we demonstrated that Akt modulates the activity of MSY3, a repressor of myogenic differentiation. Akt phosphorylation of MSY3 inhibits its repression of myogenin, thereby turning on myogenin expression upon differentiation. In adult myofibers, the Akt/MSY3 regulatory circuit is involved in down-regulating and maintaining low myogenin expression levels, in turn controlling adult skeletal muscle growth and metabolism. These results support the hypothesis that the key components of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway that control myogenin expression in muscle fibers are potential therapeutic targets for therapies to control muscle regeneration and degeneration.

Abbreviations

AChR: 

acetylcholine receptor

AP: 

Antarctic Phosphatase

BSA: 

bovine serum albumin

C/EBPα: 

CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein

CAMKII: 

calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase

Csda: 

cold shock domain A

DM: 

differentiation medium

ECL: 

electrochemiluminescence

EMSA: 

electrophoretic mobility shift assay

ERK2: 

extracellulars signal-regulated kinase

Ezh2: 

histone-lysine N-methyltransferase

FBS: 

fetal bovine serum

FoxO3a: 

forkhead box O3

GM: 

growth medium

GSK-3β: 

glycogen synthase kinase 3β

GST: 

glutathione-s-transferases

HDAC: 

histone deacetylases

HS: 

horse serum

IF: 

immunofluorescence

IGF: 

insulin-like growth factor

IP: 

immunoprecipitation

MAPK: 

mitogen-activated protein kinase

MEF2: 

myocyte enhancer factor 2

MEK: 

mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

MHC: 

myosin heavy chain

MRFs: 

myogenic regulatory factors

mTOR: 

mammalian target of rapamycin

MyoHCE: 

myogenin highly conserved element

NGF: 

normal goat serum

NMJ: 

neuromuscular junction

PBS: 

phosphate-buffered saline

pCAF: 

P300/CBP-associated factor

PI3K: 

phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PP1: 

serine/threonine protein phosphatase type-1

qRT-PCR: 

quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

SDS-PAGE: 

sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

TA: 

tibialis anterior

VEGF: 

vascular endothelial growth factor

WB: 

Western Blot

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniela Palacios and Pier Lorenzo Puri (both of Fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma, Italy) for critical reading; Brian Williams (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, US) for critical reading and proofreading; Barbara Wold (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena US) for helpful discussions, advice and support; Anita Bansal (City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, US) for help in proofreading. This work was funded by the Brain Foundation Grant and Beckman Institute Grant to Barbara Wold. We also thank the French Muscular Dystrophy Association (AFM-Telethon) for funding Libera Berghella laboratory and research.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
DAHFMO, Unit of Histology and Medical Embryology, University La Sapienza
(2)
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology
(3)
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Epigenetics and Regenerative Medicine

References

  1. Hasty P, Bradley A, Morris JH, Edmondson DG, Venuti JM, Olson EN, et al. Muscle deficiency and neonatal death in mice with a targeted mutation in the myogenin gene. Nature. 1993;364:501–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nabeshima Y, Hanaoka K, Hayasaka M, Esumi E, Li S, Nonaka I, et al. Myogenin gene disruption results in perinatal lethality because of severe muscle defect. Nature. 1993;364:532–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hughes SM, Chi MY, Lowry OH, Gundersen K. Myogenin induces a shift of enzyme activity from glycolytic to oxidative metabolism in muscles of transgenic mice. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:633–42.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Knapp JR, Davie JK, Myer A, Meadows E, Olson EN, Klein WH. Loss of myogenin in postnatal life leads to normal skeletal muscle but reduced body size. Development. 2006;133:601–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Meadows E, Cho JH, Flynn JM, Klein WH. Myogenin regulates a distinct genetic program in adult muscle stem cells. Dev Biol. 2008;322:406–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Flynn JM, Meadows E, Fiorotto M, Klein WH. Myogenin regulates exercise capacity and skeletal muscle metabolism in the adult mouse. Plos One. 2010;5:e13535.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Moresi V, Williams AH, Meadows E, Flynn JM, Potthoff MJ, McAnally J, et al. Myogenin and class II HDACs control neurogenic muscle atrophy by inducing E3 ubiquitin ligases. Cell. 2010;143:35–45.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Macpherson PC, Wang X, Goldman D. Myogenin regulates denervation-dependent muscle atrophy in mouse soleus muscle. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:2149–59.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Meadows E, Flynn JM, Klein WH. Myogenin regulates exercise capacity but is dispensable for skeletal muscle regeneration in adult mdx mice. Plos One. 2011;6:e16184.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Faralli F, Dilworth FJ. Turning on myogenin in muscle: a paradigm for understanding mechanisms of tissue-specific gene expression. Comp Funct Genomics. 2012;2012:836374.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Blagden CS, Fromm L, Burden SJ. Accelerated response of the myogenin gene to denervation in mutant mice lacking phosphorylation of myogenin at threonine 87. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:1983–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mejat A, Ramond F, Bassel-Duby R, Khochbin S, Olson EN, Schaeffer L. Histone deacetylase 9 couples neuronal activity to muscle chromatin acetylation and gene expression. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:313–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tang H, Goldman D. Activity-dependent gene regulation in skeletal muscle is mediated by a histone deacetylase (HDAC)-Dach-2-myogenin signal transduction cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16977–82.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen TJ, Waddell DS, Barrientos T, Lu Z, Feng G, Cox GA, et al. The histone deacetylase HDAC4 connects neural activity to muscle transcriptional reprogramming. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:33752–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tang H, Macpherson P, Marvin M, Meadows E, Klein WH, Yang XJ, et al. A hystone deacetylase4/myogenin positive feedback loop coordinates denervation-dependent gene induction and suppression. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;20:1120–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Berghella L, De Angelis L, De Buysscher T, Mortazavi A, Biressi S, Forcales SV, et al. A highly conserved molecular switch binds MSY-3 to regulate myogenin repression in postnatal muscle. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2125–38.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Graumann PL, Marahiel MA. Superfamily of proteins that contain the cold-shock domain. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:286–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsumoto K, Wolffe AP. Gene regulation by Y-box proteins: coupling control of transcription and translation. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:318–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Coles LS, Diamone P, Occhiodoro F, Vadas MA, Shannon MF. An ordered array of cold shock domain repressor elements across tumor necrosis factor responsive elements of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promoter. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:14482–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohno K, Izumi H, Uchiumi T, Ashizuka M, Kuwano M. The pleiotropic functions of the Y-box-binding protein, YB-1. Bioessays. 2003;25:691–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mastrangelo MA, Kleene KC. Developmental expression of Y-box protein 1 mRNA and alternatively spliced Y-box protein 3 mRNAs in spermatogenic cells in mice. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:779–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Iuchi Y, Kobayashi T, Kaneko T, Takahara M, Ogino T, Fujii J. Expression of a Y-box protein, YB2/RYB-a, precedes protamine 2 expression during spermatogenesis in rodents. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7:1023–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Penes MC, Li X, Nagy JI. Expression of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and the transcription factor ZO-1-associated nucleic acid-binding protein (ZONAB)-MsY3 in glial cells and colocalization at oligodendrocyte and astrocyte gap junctions in mouse brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:404–18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Coles LS, Lambrusco L, Burrows J, Hunter J, Diamond P, Bert AG, et al. Phosphorylation of cold shock domain/Y box proteins by ERK2 and GSK3β and repression of the human VEGF promoter. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:5372–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Balda MS, Garrett MD, Matter K. The ZO-1-associated Y-box factor ZONAB regulates epithelial cell proliferation and cell density. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:423–32.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sourisseau T, Georgiadis A, Tsapara A, Ali RR, Pestell R, Matter K, et al. Regulation of PCNA and cyclin D1 expression and epithelial morphogenesis by the ZO-1-regulated transcription factor ZONAB/DbpA. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:2387–98.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lima WR, Parreira KS, Devuyst O, Caplanusi A, N’kuli F, Marien B, et al. ZONAB promotes proliferation and represses differentiation of proximal tubule epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:478–88.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang GR, Zheng Y, Che XM, Wang XY, Zhao JH, Wu KJ, et al. Upregulation of human DNA binding protein A (dbpA) in gastric cancer cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009;10:1436–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sears D, Luong P, Yuan M, Nteliopoulos G, Man YK, Melo JV, et al. Functional phosphoproteomic analysis reveals cold-shock domain protein A to be a Bcr-Abl effector-regulating proliferation and transformation in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cell Death Dis. 2010;1:e93.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Induction, assembly, maturation and maintenance of a postsynaptic apparatus. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:791–805.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferraro E, Molinari F, Berghella L. Molecular control of neuromuscular junction development. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle. 2012;3:13–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, Lin MZ, Juo P, Hu LS, et al. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell. 1999;96:857–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicholson KM, Anderson NG. The protein kinase B/Akt signaling pathway in human malignancy. Cell Signal. 2002;14:381–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129:1261–74.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bader AG, Felts KA, Jiang N, Chang HW, Vogt PK. Y box-binding protein 1 induces resistance to oncogenic transformation by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12384–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sutherland BW, Kucab J, Wu J, Lee C, Cheang MC, Yorida E, et al. Akt phosphorylates the Y-box binding protein 1 at Ser102 located in the cold shock domain and affects the anchorage-independent growth of breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005;24:4281–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Evdokimova V, Ruzanov P, Anglesio MS, Sorokin AV, Ovchinnikov LP, Buckley J, et al. Akt-mediated YB-1 phosphorylation activates translation of silent mRNA species. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:277–92.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Bader AG, Vogt PK. Phosphorylation by Akt disables the anti-oncogenic activity of YB-1. Oncogene. 2008;27:1179–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Schiaffino S, Mammucari C. Regulation of skeletal muscle growth by the IGF1-Akt/PKB pathway: insights from genetic models. Skelet Muscle. 2011;1:4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Glass DJ. PI3 kinase regulation of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;346:267–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sandri M, Sandri C, Gilbert A, Skurk C, Calabria E, Picard A, et al. Foxo transcription factors induce the atrophy-related ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 and cause skeletal muscle atrophy. Cell. 2004;117:339–412.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Stitt TN, Drujan D, Clarke BA, Panaro F, Timofeyva Y, Kline WO, et al. The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway prevents expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Mol Cell. 2004;14:395–403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Bodine SC, Stitt TN, Gonzalez M, Kline WO, Stover GL, Bauerlein R, et al. Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:1014–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Lai KM, Gonzalez M, Poueymirou WT, Kline WO, Na E, Zlotchenko E, et al. Conditional activation of akt in adult skeletal muscle induces rapid hypertrophy. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:9295–304.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Palafacchina E, Calabria E, Serrano AL, Kalhovde JM, Schiaffino S. A protein kinase B-dependent and rapamycin sensitive pathway controls skeletal muscle growth but not fiber type specification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:9213–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sartorelli V, Fulco M. Molecular and cellular determinants of skeletal muscle atrophy and hypertrophy. Sci STKE. 2004;2004:re11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rommel C, Bodine SC, Clarke BA, Rossman R, Nunez L, Stitt TN, et al. Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:1009–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Rommel C, Clark BA, Zimmermann S, Nunez L, Rossman R, Reid K, et al. Differentiation stage-specific inhibition of the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway by Akt. Science. 1999;286:1738–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Zimmermann S, Moelling K. Phosphorylation and regulation of Raf by Akt (protein kinase B). Science. 1999;286:1741–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaliman P, Vinals F, Testar X, Palacin M, Zorzano A. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors block differentiation of skeletal muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19146–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Hribal ML, Nakae J, Kitamura T, Shutter JR, Accili D. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-dependent myoblast differentiation by Foxo forkhead transcription factors. J Cell Biol. 2003;162:535–41.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Jiang BH, Zheng JZ, Vogt PK. An essential role of phospatidylinositol 3kinase in myogenic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14179–83.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Jiang B, Aoki M, Zheng JZ, Li J, Vogt PK. Myogenic signaling of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase requires the serine-threonine kinase Akt/protein kinase B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:2077–81.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Tamir Y, Bengal E. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase induces the transcriptional activity of MEF2 proteins during muscle differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:34424–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Serra C, Palacios D, Mozzetta C, Forcales SV, Morantte I, Ripani M, et al. Functional interdependence at the chromatin level between the MKK6/p38 and IGF1/PI3K/AKT pathways during muscle differentiation. Mol Cell. 2007;28:200–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Balda MS, Matter K. The tight junction protein ZO-1 and an interacting transcription factor regulate ErbB-2 expression. EMBO J. 2000;19:2024–33.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Merlie JP, Mudd J, Cheng TC, Olson EN. Myogenin and acetylcholine receptor alpha gene promoters mediate transcriptional regulation in response to motor innervation. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:2461–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Karin M, Hunter T. Transcriptional control by protein phosphorylation: signal transmission from the cell surface to the nucleus. Curr Biol. 1995;5:747–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaneco S, Feldman RI, YU L, Wu Z, Gritsko T, Shelley SA, et al. Positive feedback regulation between Akt2 and MyoD during muscle differentiation: cloning of Akt2 promoter. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:23230–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson EM, Rotwein P. Selective control of skeletal muscle differentiation by Akt 1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5106–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Kohn AD, Barthel A, Kovacina KS, Boge A, Wallach B, Summers SA, et al. Construction and characterization of a conditionally active version of the serine/threonine kinase Akt. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:11937–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Jurchott K, Bergmann S, Stein U, Walther W, Janz M, Manni I, et al. YB-1 as a cell cycle-regulated transcription factor facilitating cyclin A and cyclin B1 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27988–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Obata T, Yaffe MB, Leparc GG, Piro ET, Maegawa H, Kashiwagi A, et al. Peptide and protein library screening defines optimal substrate motifs for AKT/PKB. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36108–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Hornbeck PV, Kornhauser JM, Tkachev S, Zhang B, Skrzypek E, Murray B, et al. PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D261–70.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Chiang DY, Lebesgue N, Beavers DL, Alsina KM, Damen JM, Voigt N, et al. Alterations in the interactome of serine/threonine protein phosphatase type-1 in atrial fibrillation patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:163–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Lu ZH, Books JT, Ley TJ. Cold shock domain family members YB-1 and MSY4 share essential functions during murine embryogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:8410–7.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Berkes CA, Bergstrom DA, Penn BH, Seaver KJ, Knoepfler PS, Tapscott SJ. Pbx marks genes for activation by MyoD indicating a role for a homeodomain protein in establishing myogenic potential. Mol Cell. 2004;14:465–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Song YJ, Lee H. YB1/p32, a nuclear Y-box binding protein 1, is a novel regulator of myoblast differentiation that interacts with Msx1 homeoprotein. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:517–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang GL, Iakova P, Wilde M, Awad S, Timchenko NA. Liver tumors escape negative control of proliferation via PI3K/Akt-mediated block of C/EBPα growth inhibitory activity. Genes Dev. 2004;2004(18):912–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Liu Y, Liu F, Yu H, Zhao X, Sashida G, Deblasio A, et al. Akt phosphorylates the transcriptional repressor bmi1 to block its effects on the tumor-suppressing ink4a-arf locus. Sci Signal. 2012;5:ra77.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Kavanagh E, Buchert M, Tsapara A, Chouquet A, Balda MS, Hollande F, et al. Functional interaction between the ZO-1-interacting transcription factor ZONAB/DbpA and the RNA processing factor symplekin. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:5098–105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Blaauw B, Canato M, Agatea L, Toniolo L, Mammucari C, Masiero E, et al. Inducible activation of Akt increases skeletal muscle mass and force without satellite cell activation. FASEB J. 2009;23:3896–905.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. McKinsley TA, Zhang CL, Olson EN. Identification of a signal-responsive nuclear export sequence in class II histone deacetylase. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:6312–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Yano S, Tokumitsu H, Soderling TR. Calcium promotes cell survival through CaM-K kinase activation of the protein-kinase-B pathway. Nature. 1998;396:584–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Grounds MD, Garrett KL, Lai MC, Wright WE, Beilharz MW. Identification of skeletal muscle precursor cells in vivo by use of MyoD1 and myogenin probes. Cell Tissue Res. 1992;267:99–104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Florini JR, Ewton DZ, Coolican SA. Growth hormone and the insulin-like growth factor system in myogenesis. Endocr Rev. 1996;17:481–517. 75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Musaro A, McCullagh K, Paul A, Houghton L, Dobrowolny G, Molinaro M, et al. Localized Igf-1 transgene expression sustains hypertrophy and regeneration in senescent skeletal muscle. Nat Genet. 2001;27:195–200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. MacDonald EM, Andres-Mateos E, Mejias R, Simmers JL, Mi R, Park JS, et al. Denervation atrophy is independent from Akt and mTOR activation and is not rescued by myostatin inhibition. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7:471–81.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© De Angelis et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement