Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correction to: Comparison of multiple transcriptomes exposes unified and divergent features of quiescent and activated skeletal muscle stem cells

Skeletal Muscle volume 8, Article number: 19 (2018) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 22 December 2017

Correction

After publication of this article [1], the authors noted that the legends for Additional file 3: Figure S3 and Additional file 4: Figure S4 were truncated in the production process, therefore lacking some information concerning these Figures. The complete legends are included in this Correction. The authors apologize for any inconvenience that this might have caused.

Reference

  1. Pietrosemoli N, Mella S, Yennek S, et al. Comparison of multiple transcriptomes exposes unified and divergent features of quiescent and activated skeletal muscle stem cells. Skelet Muscle. 2017;7:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Natalia Pietrosemoli, Sébastien Mella, Siham Yennek, Meryem B. Baghdadi, Hiroshi Sakai and Ramkumar Sambasivan contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, C3BI, USR 3756 IP CNRS, Institut Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France

    Natalia Pietrosemoli

  2. Stem Cells and Development, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France

    Sébastien Mella, Siham Yennek, Meryem B. Baghdadi, Hiroshi Sakai, Francesca Pala, Daniela Di Girolamo & Shahragim Tajbakhsh

  3. CNRS UMR 3738, Institut Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France

    Sébastien Mella, Siham Yennek, Meryem B. Baghdadi, Hiroshi Sakai, Francesca Pala & Shahragim Tajbakhsh

  4. Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK PO, Bellary Road, Bengaluru, 560065, India

    Ramkumar Sambasivan

  5. Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy

    Daniela Di Girolamo

  6. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology, DanStem, University of Copenhagen, 3B Blegdamsvej, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark

    Siham Yennek

Authors
  1. Natalia Pietrosemoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sébastien Mella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siham Yennek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meryem B. Baghdadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hiroshi Sakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ramkumar Sambasivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Francesca Pala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daniela Di Girolamo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shahragim Tajbakhsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahragim Tajbakhsh.

Additional files

Additional file 3:

Figure S3. Effect of adding NICD[E17.5/E14.5] dataset on the best combinations of datasets. Best combination of datasets was determined by the bigger overlap between n (= degree) datasets. n varies from 1 (the dataset containing the most DEGs) to 10 (all the datasets except NICD[E17.5/E14.5]). Blue bars/numbers indicate the number of best overlap between the n datasets, orange bars/numbers indicate, the extent of overlap when NICD[E17.5/E14.5] was added to this best combination. (PDF 395 kb)

Additional file 4:

Figure S4. Effect of PFA treatment at different time points in the experimental procedure. Top: Schematic showing the simplified experimental procedure of cell fixation before or after muscle dissociation/cell sorting. “0 h” refers to cells fixed prior to muscle dissociation and cell sorting, while “5 h” refers to cells that undergo muscle dissociation and cell sorting prior any treatment (+/− PFA). Bottom: Barplots showing the effect of PFA treatment after muscle dissociation/cell sorting. Bars represent the fold change (in Log10) of expression between freshly isolated QSCs (0 h + PFA) and QSCs after muscle dissociation/cell sorting with or without PFA treatment, 5 h + PFA and 5 h –PFA, respectively. (PDF 445 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pietrosemoli, N., Mella, S., Yennek, S. et al. Correction to: Comparison of multiple transcriptomes exposes unified and divergent features of quiescent and activated skeletal muscle stem cells. Skeletal Muscle 8, 19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-018-0165-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-018-0165-y

Skeletal Muscle

ISSN: 2044-5040

Contact us