Skip to main content
Download PDF

N-terminal titin fragment: a non-invasive, pharmacodynamic biomarker for microdystrophin efficacy

Skeletal Muscle volume 14, Article number: 2 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multiple clinical trials to assess the efficacy of AAV-directed gene transfer in participants with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are ongoing. The success of these trials currently relies on standard functional outcome measures that may exhibit variability within and between participants, rendering their use as sole measures of drug efficacy challenging. Given this, supportive objective biomarkers may be useful in enhancing observed clinical results. Creatine kinase (CK) is traditionally used as a diagnostic biomarker of DMD, but its potential as a robust pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker is difficult due to the wide variability seen within the same participant over time. Thus, there is a need for the discovery and validation of novel PD biomarkers to further support and bolster traditional outcome measures of efficacy in DMD.

Method

Potential PD biomarkers in DMD participant urine were examined using a proteomic approach on the Somalogic platform. Findings were confirmed in both mdx mice and Golden Retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dog plasma samples.

Results

Changes in the N-terminal fragment of titin, a well-known, previously characterized biomarker of DMD, were correlated with the expression of microdystrophin protein in mice, dogs, and humans. Further, titin levels were sensitive to lower levels of expressed microdystrophin when compared to CK.

Conclusion

The measurement of objective PD biomarkers such as titin may provide additional confidence in the assessment of the mechanism of action and efficacy in gene therapy clinical trials of DMD.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03368742.

Introduction

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating, severe myopathy that results in muscle wasting over time, leading to loss of ambulation and premature death. The cause of the disease is a loss of function mutation in the DMD gene, which encodes for the protein dystrophin that is essential for muscle health [1,2,3]. Dystrophin acts both as a membrane stabilizer to support proper muscle contractions [4,5,6,7,8] and as a signaling molecule that assists in various functions throughout the myofiber [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In its absence, the muscle membrane is damaged, signaling pathways are disrupted and muscle force is reduced. Over time, the skeletal muscle is replaced with fat and fibrotic tissue [22], underpinning the progressive nature of the disease.

A hallmark of muscle damage is elevated circulating proteins, usually of muscle origin, that have either been actively released or passively leaked from the muscle [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. This suggests that under conditions of muscle damage, there are physical ruptures and/or altered signaling pathways in myofibers, resulting in a myopathic signature that can be observed in biofluids such as serum, plasma, or urine. A well-characterized marker of muscle damage is serum creatine kinase (CK), which is a widely used diagnostic marker for DMD, as well as other muscle diseases [40]. However, while elevated CK is a reliable biomarker of early-stage disease, it has been shown to decrease over time as a result of the progressive muscle loss associated with disease progression in DMD. Hence, the utility of CK and other muscle-specific proteins that are not typically found in circulation is more robust during earlier stages of the disease [23].

To prevent the accrual of additional muscle damage and subsequent muscle loss, several gene therapies, including Elevidys™ (delandistrogene moxeparvovec-rokl) suspension, which received FDA accelerated approval approved for use in 4–5-year-olds [41], have been designed to restore expression of a functional, albeit shortened, form of the dystrophin protein. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene transfer involves systemic administration of an AAV vector containing a transgene that expresses a mini- or micro-dystrophin that is delivered to muscles throughout the body. Ongoing clinical trials using different AAV capsids and microdystrophin construct designs have reported protein expression in muscle biopsies at an average of ~ 20–50% of normal dystrophin levels [42,43,44]. These differing AAV microdystrophin gene therapies have demonstrated functional efficacy in the mdx mouse model of DMD and in the Golden Retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dog model [45,46,47,48,49]. However, the functional impact of these rationally designed proteins is currently being investigated as microdystrophins do not exist in nature. Further, the relationship between the functionality of a given quantity of microdystrophin as compared to normal, full-length dystrophin is currently unknown.

Functional outcome measures such as the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and the 4-stair climb are standard efficacy assessments incorporated into DMD clinical trial designs with the objective of determining if treatments result in clinically meaningful changes for participants. However, these standard outcome measures exhibit variability both within and between participants [50, 51]. Supportive, noninvasive pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers such as serum CK are potentially useful adjuncts to contextualize functional outcome measures, as they represent objective measurements that are downstream of microdystrophin’s direct mechanism of action of stabilizing the muscle membrane. Further, biomarkers within circulation provide a snapshot of muscle health throughout the body. However, CK is known to have wide intra- and inter-subject variability [52, 53], is thought to passively leak from the muscle, and decreases with age in DMD [53], limiting its usefulness as a PD biomarker of therapeutic efficacy, especially in older participants.

Previous studies have shown differences in several circulating proteins across multiple biofluids using various proteomic methods that seem to be driven by the lack of dystrophin in skeletal and cardiac muscles [23, 24, 26, 27, 33, 36, 54, 55]. Some of the more highly characterized markers have included titin [23, 34,35,36,37, 56], troponin [35, 38, 57,58,59,60,61], MMP9/TIMP1 [26, 31, 32, 62, 63], myomiRs [28,29,30, 64,65,66], MDH2 [23, 55], CA3 [24,25,26,27, 67,68,69,70], and MYOM3 [23, 24]. Out of these markers, urinary titin has recently been shown to act as a PD biomarker in mdx mice treated with exon-skipping drugs [34]. To explore the potential of these and additional noninvasive PD markers in DMD, proteomic screens were carried out using Somalogic’s SOMAscan platform. The screens were performed to measure circulating (serum/plasma) and/or cleared (urine) proteins in biofluids from AAV9-CK8-microdystrophin-treated mdx mice, GRMD dogs, and DMD participants. Titin, a marker previously associated with muscle damage in DMD [23, 36], was found to better correlate with changes in expressed microdystrophin protein and was more sensitive to changes in drug efficacy when compared to serum CK. Thus, titin may be a useful biomarker adjunct to microdystrophin expression measures in gene therapy clinical trials for DMD.

Results

SOMAscan identifies the N-terminal fragment of titin in DMD participant urine

Urine is an attractive biofluid as it is less invasive than serum/plasma collection and reduces the burden for clinical trial participation. As such, characterization of the urinary proteome in DMD participants, which has been previously described using mass spectrometry and antibody-based assays, was performed [36, 54]. The SOMAscan platform from Somalogic employs a non-biased method using its proprietary SOMAmer® aptamers to detect the presence of a large array of proteins (~ 7000) in a given sample [71,72,73]. Urine obtained from DMD participants and healthy age-matched controls from a previously characterized cohort [74] were used to quantify proteins found in the urine that may be altered by the expression of dystrophin—and potentially microdystrophin—in the muscle. The top ten upregulated and downregulated proteins (Table 1) were identified and significance was assessed using a 2-way ANOVA.

Table 1 Altered protein expression in human urine
Full size table

Titin and ferritin proteins were found to be significantly upregulated (Fig. 1A), while benign prostate-specific antigen was significantly downregulated in DMD urine (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, increases in titin and ferritin have been previously described in DMD urine [36, 54], with titin being extensively characterized in the context of DMD disease biology [23, 34,35,36,37]. Due to the knowledge base already established for circulating and/or cleared titin’s role in DMD, titin was pursued as a potential PD biomarker in response to microdystrophin expression.

Fig. 1
figure 1

DMD urine proteome characterization using the Somalogic platform. SOMAscan assay identified (a) upregulated and (b) downregulated proteins in DMD urine when compared to healthy age-matched controls

Full size image

To gain additional confidence in the observed differences in titin quantities between DMD participants and healthy controls, Somalogic’s menu was searched and one SOMAmer aptamer that ostensibly detects the titin protein (SomaID SL006679) was identified. Somalogic has disclosed that this SOMAmer detects the N-terminal fragment of titin (amino acids 1–194) (Fig. 2A), which was expected since previous studies have identified this same fragment in DMD urine [36]. To confirm the SOMAmer result, a Western blot was performed using an antibody that detects the N-terminal fragment of titin. The titin protein fragment was only present in DMD urine (Fig. 2B), thereby replicating previously published data as well as confirming the SOMAmer results [36]. To quantify titin levels, a commercial ELISA developed against the N-terminal fragment was used to find a 267-fold increase in DMD participant urine compared to healthy age-matched controls (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The SOMAmer detects the previously characterized N-terminal fragment of titin in DMD patient urine. A SOMAmer detects the N-terminal fragment (amino acids 1–194) of titin. B Western blot using anti-TTN mouse monoclonal antibody [clone: 7D3] against amino acids 1–110 shows the presence of the fragment in DMD (lanes 7–14) urine, as well its absence in age-matched healthy controls (lanes 1–6). C Human urine ELISA confirms increases in the titin fragment seen in the SOMAscan panel and Western blot. D Normalization of the ELISA results using creatinine, E specific gravity, and F cystatin C show significant increases in the urinary titin fragment in DMD urine. For individual plots of normalization values, see Supplementary Fig. 1

Full size image

Even though urine collections are easy and not limited by low volume amounts, it is a difficult biofluid to normalize when comparing across samples since many factors such as hydration and total volume collected can drastically impact results. To test different normalization factors, we used total creatinine (Fig. 2D), specific gravity (Fig. 2E), and cystatin C (Fig. 2F), all of which have been previously used in the context of DMD [34, 35, 37, 75] (Supplementary Fig. 1). Regardless of the normalization method, there was a strong association between elevated titin protein levels and DMD disease state.

Urinary titin: a potential pharmacodynamic biomarker in DMD participants expressing microdystrophin

To test the applicability of titin as a potential pharmacodynamic biomarker in humans, urine samples were assessed using the SOMAscan assay at baseline, day 180, and day 360 from DMD participants treated with AAV9-CK8-μDys5 who participated in the IGNITE DMD clinical trial (NCT03368742). When samples were grouped by dose, we observed no statistically significant difference in urinary titin quantities; however, there was a wide range of microdystrophin expression in the muscle biopsies across participants.

Participants were segmented into one of two groups based on the percentage of microdystrophin-positive fibers from the vastus lateralis: Group 1 participants had < 10% microdystrophin-positive fibers and Group 2 had > 10% microdystrophin-positive fibers (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of patients run on somalogic urine panel
Full size table

This grouping was justified based on previous literature showing that Becker muscular dystrophy, a milder and slower-progressing form of muscular dystrophy compared to DMD, is associated with > 10% of muscle fibers expressing a truncated form of dystrophin [76]. When comparing the groups, there were no differences with respect to age, baseline urinary titin, and serum CK activity levels. At day 90 post-dose, Group 1 participants had an average of 2% microdystrophin-positive muscle fibers, while Group 2 participants had an average of 47% microdystrophin-positive fibers.

Urinary titin levels were quantified at baseline, day 180 and day 360 post-AAV9-CK8-μDys5 administration. Substantial, time-dependent decreases in urinary titin levels were observed in Group 2 participants, with both day 180 and 360 values reaching statistical significance compared to baseline levels, while the levels in Group 1 participants remained unchanged (Fig. 3). Similarly, serum CK activity showed a downward trend at day 180, but exhibited greater variability and did not reach a statistical significance until day 360 post-dose (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

CK8-μDys5 reduces urinary titin in the presence of 40–50% microdystrophin-positive fibers. A Group 1 (microdystrophin < 10% positive fibers in the vastus lateralis) shows no changes in urinary titin or serum CK activity 360 days post-treatment. B Group 2 (microdystrophin > 10% positive fibers in the vastus lateralis) shows decreases in urinary titin at day 180 and 360, while serum CK activity was trending at day 180, but significantly changed at day 360 only

Full size image

Circulating titin is highly conserved across multiple species and biofluids

Since the SOMAmer aptamer detects the N-terminal titin fragment, amino acid sequences across multiple species were compared to test if the Somalogic platform would be beneficial for testing preclinical samples. Uniprot sequence alignment of mouse, dog, and human to the aptamer found high sequence homology (95%) to humans when compared to both mouse and dog (Fig. 4A). Blood samples, not urine, were available from preclinical studies in mdx mouse and GRMD dog models; however, it was hypothesized that the N-terminal fragment may be present in blood as well due to the biomarker’s mechanism of action. As shown in Fig. 4, the SOMAmer was indeed able to detect the N-terminal fragment in plasma for both mouse and dog.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Circulating titin shows changes at lower levels of expressed microdystrophin when compared to CK-MM in preclinical DMD models. A The Somalogic aptamer detects the N terminal portion (AA 1–194) of the titin protein. This region was predicted to be highly conserved across mice, dogs, and humans. B Titin showed a response in vastus lateralis at > 50% microdystrophin levels, while an increase or no change was observed in CK-MM in the GRMD dogs 90 days post-treatment. C Circulating titin was also decreased in the plasma of mdx mice at lower levels of expressed microdystrophin in quadriceps when compared to CK-MM

Full size image

To model the clinical data and enhance confidence in our findings, the SOMAscan panel plasma from GRMD dogs that were treated intravenously with 1.0E13, 1.0E14, or 2.0E14 vg/kg AAV9-CK8-μDys5 was tested. The characterization of this cohort of GRMD dogs has been extensively described [46]. Plasma was assayed at 90 days post-treatment to replicate biopsy timepoints in which multiple clinical trials have reported microdystrophin expression data. The results showed a decrease in circulating titin in the range of 50–80% fibers positive for microdystrophin expression (≥ 1.0E14 vg/kg) in the vastus lateralis, while no changes in circulating CK-MM protein was observed at any dose or microdystrophin expression level (Fig. 4B). A similar trend was observed in mdx mice with decreases in circulating titin observed at significantly lower levels of microdystrophin (quantified by mass spectrometry in quadriceps) compared to CK-MM protein (Fig. 4C).

Discussion

The standard functional outcome measures employed in clinical trials of DMD participants could benefit from the incorporation of additional supportive and objective endpoints for the assessment of therapeutic efficacy. Heterogeneity of disease phenotype, small participant numbers, and lack of sensitivity, as well as potential for subjective bias leave significant room for improvement in the clinical deployment and contextualization of these standard measures in a trial setting [77]. Measures must be compared to natural history to rule out changes due to disease; however, real-world evidence using characterized cohorts has limitations [78]. Placebo arms may impart more rigor to these assessments, but there are also significant ethical considerations around the use of placebo controls for participants with a rare, progressive, and universally fatal disease. Traditionally, functional measurements such as the NSAA, 6MWT, and 4-stair climb are used as definitive readouts to assess drug efficacy, but the sensitivity needed to detect potential changes in drug effects in a reasonable period of time is very high, especially when changes owing to disease progression occur over many years. Additionally, motivation is known to affect some outcome measures [79], so motivational bias cannot be ruled out when changes in the functional measurements are observed.

One way to bolster and substantiate current tools is the incorporation of objective biomarkers into clinical trial designs. Objective biomarkers are easier to identify in genetic diseases with a known defect. In DMD, microdystrophin expression is presumed to be a surrogate biomarker of clinical benefit based on extensive preclinical data in combination with known mechanisms of action and outcomes in participants with mutations that result in shortened dystrophin proteins [45, 46, 80]. Many have attempted to utilize serum CK as a biomarker to detect drug-induced effects in the context of clinical trials of DMD, but only trends have been observed thus far [81]. In addition, as this biomarker is known to decrease with increasing muscle loss during disease progression, it is not ideal for assessing drug efficacy over time, especially in older participants. To look for better candidate pharmacodynamic markers, urine samples from DMD participants who received AAV9-CK8-μDys5 were evaluated and changes in the N-terminal titin fragment were observed. By grouping participants according to microdystrophin expression levels, the effect of AAV transduction was controlled and showed that the decrease in the N-terminal fragment of titin appears to be driven by the presence of increased expression of microdystrophin protein in muscle fibers. Further, changes in titin were detected earlier post-treatment than changes in serum CK. This result was replicated in both the mdx mouse and the GRMD dog model, where alterations in plasma circulating titin occurred at lower levels of restored microdystrophin when compared to CK-MM.

Although the reason for the enhanced sensitivity of titin as compared to CK is currently unknown, a hypothesis is that the aptamer may exhibit greater sensitivity and/or specificity for the detection of titin vs. available reagents for quantification of CK-MM. The fact that this sensitivity was still present when compared to the CK activity assay in the IGNITE DMD trial suggests that additional biology could also be at play. It is known that titin has a slower rate of decline over time when compared to serum CK, so the window needed to detect a change could be greater, allowing for more sensitivity [55]. Additionally, it is also hypothesized that the N-terminal fragment has an active, specific proteolysis event that releases it into circulation, while serum CK is thought to leak passively [35,36,37]. More studies to analyze the overlapping and distinct biology around these markers would be beneficial.

While the added sensitivity of titin brings potential advantages towards evaluating therapeutic efficacy, since it is also a muscle-specific protein, similar to CK, it is also likely to decrease with age and the corresponding muscle loss in DMD [23, 37]. The optimal marker would possess a directional trajectory that is opposite that of the natural history of the disease, but this may be difficult to achieve as most muscle-specific proteins identified to date in biofluids increase early in the disease state and decline as muscle is lost. Therefore, additional objective biomarkers that remain stable through later stages of disease that may be paired with serum CK and the N-terminal titin fragment would increase confidence in drug effects. Regardless, additional studies of urinary titin through the natural history of DMD, as well as its performance over time in clinical trials and its ability to bolster the interpretation of both functional outcome measures and microdystrophin expression itself in therapeutic trials, may improve the ability to detect and quantify the benefits of therapeutic approaches aimed at restoring muscle integrity, such as microdystrophin gene therapy.

Methods

Study approval

The mouse study was performed according to the Dalhousie University Committee on Laboratory Animals under an approved protocol and in compliance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines at Agada Biosciences. The approval for the dog study was previously published [46] and all legal guardians and/or participants participating in the IGNITE DMD trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03368742) provided written informed consent before enrollment.

Statistics

All statistical tests were run in GraphPad Prism. Means and standard deviations were calculated for each group. For analysis that included more than two groups, an ordinary one-way ANOVA using multiple comparisons was selected and the mean of each group was compared with the mean of the vehicle-treated or baseline control. For analysis that included two groups, an unpaired parametric t test was used to identify significant changes in biomarkers.

Biofluid collection

Plasma/serum

The blood was collected into K2EDTA tubes for plasma or 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes for serum and immediately placed on ice. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm at 4℃. Supernatants from each tube were aliquoted to two Eppendorf tubes and stored at − 80℃ until further analysis. For serum CK activity, quantification was determined using the Pointe Scientific Liquid Creatine Kinase Reagent Set (ref:C7522-450).

Urine

Urine was centrifuged at 1500xg for 10 min at 4℃ to remove cell debris, aliquoted, and stored at − 80℃ until assayed.

Protein quantification

SOMAscan assay

Frozen plasma or urine aliquots were shipped to Somalogic, and mouse and dog plasma were run on SOMAscan 4 K, while the human urine was run on the SOMAscan Discovery Assay. Data were delivered in an ADAT file that contained normalized RFUs from their analysis pipeline.

Immunofluorescence

Isopentane frozen muscles were sectioned (8 microns) and stained for microdystrophin (MANEX44A, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa), as previously described [46].

Mass spectrometry for mdx microdystrophin quantification

Dystrophin quantification was performed using methods previously published [46, 82, 83]. Briefly, in-gel digestion was performed on protein extracts from quadricep tissue spiked with a stable isotope internal standard. The resulting peptides were subjected to time-targeted parallel reaction monitoring nano-LC–MS/MS. Quantified microdystrophin protein was reported as a percentage of normal dystrophin calculated using a regression slope of a 5-point standard curve derived from a combination of protein from wild-type and dystrophin-deficient canine tissue.

Urinary titin

For Western blot analysis, 3μL of urine was separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis using a previously published protocol [36]. The N-terminal fragment was detected with titin (7D3) antibody (Novus Biologicals). For confirmation using ELISA, urinary titin levels were quantified with the IBL ELISA kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. For normalization, the creatinine colorimetric assay (Caymen Chemicals), specific gravity as measured by refractometer (Laxco Benchtop Digital), and cystatin C ELISA (Abcam) were used following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Monaco AP, Neve RL, Colletti-Feener C, Bertelson CJ, Kurnit DM, Kunkel LM. Isolation of candidate cDNAs for portions of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Nature. 1986;323(6089):646–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burghes AH, Logan C, Hu X, Belfall B, Worton RG, Ray PN. A cDNA clone from the Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy gene. Nature. 1987;328(6129):434–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffman EP, Brown RH Jr, Kunkel LM. Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell. 1987;51(6):919–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ervasti JM, Campbell KP. A role for the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex as a transmembrane linker between laminin and actin. J Cell Biol. 1993;122(4):809–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weller B, Karpati G, Carpenter S. Dystrophin-deficient mdx muscle fibers are preferentially vulnerable to necrosis induced by experimental lengthening contractions. J Neurol Sci. 1990;100(1–2):9–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Menke A, Jockusch H. Decreased osmotic stability of dystrophin-less muscle cells from the mdx mouse. Nature. 1991;349(6304):69–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stedman HH, Sweeney HL, Shrager JB, Maguire HC, Panettieri RA, Petrof B, et al. The mdx mouse diaphragm reproduces the degenerative changes of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature. 1991;352(6335):536–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Franco A Jr, Lansman JB. Calcium entry through stretch-inactivated ion channels in mdx myotubes. Nature. 1990;344(6267):670–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Belanto JJ, Mader TL, Eckhoff MD, Strandjord DM, Banks GB, Gardner MK, et al. Microtubule binding distinguishes dystrophin from utrophin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(15):5723–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai Y, Thomas GD, Yue Y, Yang HT, Li D, Long C, et al. Dystrophins carrying spectrin-like repeats 16 and 17 anchor nNOS to the sarcolemma and enhance exercise performance in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(3):624–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Legrand B, Giudice E, Nicolas A, Delalande O, Le Rumeur E. Computational study of the human dystrophin repeats: interaction properties and molecular dynamics. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8): e23819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Molza AE, Mangat K, Le Rumeur E, Hubert JF, Menhart N, Delalande O. Structural basis of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase interaction with dystrophin repeats 16 and 17. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(49):29531–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Amann KJ, Renley BA, Ervasti JM. A cluster of basic repeats in the dystrophin rod domain binds F-actin through an electrostatic interaction. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(43):28419–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rybakova IN, Amann KJ, Ervasti JM. A new model for the interaction of dystrophin with F-actin. J Cell Biol. 1996;135(3):661–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Rumeur E, Fichou Y, Pottier S, Gaboriau F, Rondeau-Mouro C, Vincent M, et al. Interaction of dystrophin rod domain with membrane phospholipids. Evidence of a close proximity between tryptophan residues and lipids. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(8):5993–6001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prins KW, Humston JL, Mehta A, Tate V, Ralston E, Ervasti JM. Dystrophin is a microtubule-associated protein. J Cell Biol. 2009;186(3):363–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhosle RC, Michele DE, Campbell KP, Li Z, Robson RM. Interactions of intermediate filament protein synemin with dystrophin and utrophin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;346(3):768–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chao DS, Gorospe JR, Brenman JE, Rafael JA, Peters MF, Froehner SC, et al. Selective loss of sarcolemmal nitric oxide synthase in Becker muscular dystrophy. J Exp Med. 1996;184(2):609–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boehler JF, Ricotti V, Gonzalez JP, Soustek-Kramer M, Such L, Brown KJ, et al. Membrane recruitment of nNOSmicro in microdystrophin gene transfer to enhance durability. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019;29(10):735–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobayashi YM, Rader EP, Crawford RW, Iyengar NK, Thedens DR, Faulkner JA, et al. Sarcolemma-localized nNOS is required to maintain activity after mild exercise. Nature. 2008;456(7221):511–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson MD, Rosenberry R, Barresi R, Tsimerinov EI, Rader F, Tang X, et al. Sodium nitrate alleviates functional muscle ischaemia in patients with Becker muscular dystrophy. J Physiol. 2015;593(23):5183–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu GC, Jong YJ, Chiang CH, Jaw TS. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: MR grading system with functional correlation. Radiology. 1993;186(2):475–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hathout Y, Marathi RL, Rayavarapu S, Zhang A, Brown KJ, Seol H, et al. Discovery of serum protein biomarkers in the mdx mouse model and cross-species comparison to Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(24):6458–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rouillon J, Poupiot J, Zocevic A, Amor F, Leger T, Garcia C, et al. Serum proteomic profiling reveals fragments of MYOM3 as potential biomarkers for monitoring the outcome of therapeutic interventions in muscular dystrophies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(17):4916–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ohta M, Itagaki Y, Itoh N, Hayashi K, Nishitani H, Ohta K. Carbonic anhydrase III in serum in muscular dystrophy and other neurological disorders: relationship with creatine kinase. Clin Chem. 1991;37(1):36–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ayoglu B, Chaouch A, Lochmuller H, Politano L, Bertini E, Spitali P, et al. Affinity proteomics within rare diseases: a BIO-NMD study for blood biomarkers of muscular dystrophies. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(7):918–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hathout Y, Brody E, Clemens PR, Cripe L, DeLisle RK, Furlong P, et al. Large-scale serum protein biomarker discovery in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(23):7153–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Coenen-Stass AML, Wood MJA, Roberts TC. Biomarker potential of extracellular miRNAs in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(11):989–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cacchiarelli D, Legnini I, Martone J, Cazzella V, D’Amico A, Bertini E, et al. miRNAs as serum biomarkers for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. EMBO Mol Med. 2011;3(5):258–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zaharieva IT, Calissano M, Scoto M, Preston M, Cirak S, Feng L, et al. Dystromirs as serum biomarkers for monitoring the disease severity in Duchenne muscular Dystrophy. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e80263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lourbakos A, Yau N, de Bruijn P, Hiller M, Kozaczynska K, Jean-Baptiste R, et al. Evaluation of serum MMP-9 as predictive biomarker for antisense therapy in Duchenne. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nadarajah VD, van Putten M, Chaouch A, Garrood P, Straub V, Lochmuller H, et al. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a biomarker for monitoring disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Neuromuscul Disord. 2011;21(8):569–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hathout Y, Seol H, Han MH, Zhang A, Brown KJ, Hoffman EP. Clinical utility of serum biomarkers in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ishii MN, Nakashima M, Kamiguchi H, Zach N, Kuboki R, Baba R, et al. Urine titin as a novel biomarker for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2023;33(4):302–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Robertson AS, Majchrzak MJ, Smith CM, Gagnon RC, Devidze N, Banks GB, et al. Dramatic elevation in urinary amino terminal titin fragment excretion quantified by immunoassay in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients and in dystrophin deficient rodents. Neuromuscul Disord. 2017;27(7):635–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rouillon J, Zocevic A, Leger T, Garcia C, Camadro JM, Udd B, et al. Proteomics profiling of urine reveals specific titin fragments as biomarkers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24(7):563–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Awano H, Matsumoto M, Nagai M, Shirakawa T, Maruyama N, Iijima K, et al. Diagnostic and clinical significance of the titin fragment in urine of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;476:111–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Burch PM, Pogoryelova O, Goldstein R, Bennett D, Guglieri M, Straub V, et al. Muscle-derived proteins as serum biomarkers for monitoring disease progression in three forms of muscular dystrophy. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2015;2(3):241–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mariot V, Joubert R, Hourde C, Feasson L, Hanna M, Muntoni F, et al. Downregulation of myostatin pathway in neuromuscular diseases may explain challenges of anti-myostatin therapeutic approaches. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Okinaka S, Kumagai H, Ebashi S, Sugita H, Momoi H, Toyokura Y, et al. Serum creatine phosphokinase. Activity in progressive muscular dystrophy and neuromuscular diseases. Arch Neurol. 1961;4:520–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Therapeutics S. Sarepta therapeutics announces FDA approval of ELEVIDYS, the first gene therapy to treat duchenne muscular dystrophy. 2023. Accessed 17 Oct 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Therapeutics S. Cellular, tissue and gene therapies advisotry committee meeting presentation. 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pfizer. Pfizer’s new phase 1b results of gene therapy in ambulatory boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) support advancement into pivotal phase 3 study. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Biosciences S. Solid biosciences reports fourth quarter and full-year 2021 financial results and 2-year efficacy and safety data from the ongoing phase I/II IGNITE DMD clinical trial of SGT-001. 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hakim CH, Wasala NB, Pan X, Kodippili K, Yue Y, Zhang K, et al. A five-repeat micro-dystrophin gene ameliorated dystrophic phenotype in the severe DBA/2J-mdx model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2017;6:216–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Birch SM, Lawlor MW, Conlon TJ, Guo LJ, Crudele JM, Hawkins EC, et al. Assessment of systemic AAV-microdystrophin gene therapy in the GRMD model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(677):eabo1815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Le Guiner C, Servais L, Montus M, Larcher T, Fraysse B, Moullec S, et al. Long-term microdystrophin gene therapy is effective in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat Commun. 2017;8:16105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Harper SQ, Hauser MA, DelloRusso C, Duan D, Crawford RW, Phelps SF, et al. Modular flexibility of dystrophin: implications for gene therapy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat Med. 2002;8(3):253–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang B, Li J, Xiao X. Adeno-associated virus vector carrying human minidystrophin genes effectively ameliorates muscular dystrophy in mdx mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(25):13714–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Muntoni F, Domingos J, Manzur AY, Mayhew A, Guglieri M, Network UKN, et al. Categorising trajectories and individual item changes of the North Star Ambulatory Assessment in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0221097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ricotti V, Ridout DA, Pane M, Main M, Mayhew A, Mercuri E, et al. The NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: considerations for the design of clinical trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(2):149–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jackson MJ, Round JM, Newham DJ, Edwards RH. An examination of some factors influencing creatine kinase in the blood of patients with muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 1987;10(1):15–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Barp A, Ferrero A, Casagrande S, Morini R, Zuccarino R. Circulating biomarkers in neuromuscular disorders: what is known, what is new. Biomolecules. 2021;11(8):1246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Rouillon J, Lefebvre T, Denard J, Puy V, Daher R, Ausseil J, et al. High urinary ferritin reflects myoglobin iron evacuation in DMD patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018;28(7):564–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Signorelli M, Ayoglu B, Johansson C, Lochmuller H, Straub V, Muntoni F, et al. Longitudinal serum biomarker screening identifies malate dehydrogenase 2 as candidate prognostic biomarker for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11(2):505–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Maruyama N, Asai T, Abe C, Inada A, Kawauchi T, Miyashita K, et al. Establishment of a highly sensitive sandwich ELISA for the N-terminal fragment of titin in urine. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim EY, Lee JW, Suh MR, Choi WA, Kang SW, Oh HJ. Correlation of serum creatine kinase level with pulmonary function in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(2):306–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hor KN, Johnston P, Kinnett K, Mah ML, Stiver C, Markham L, et al. Progression of Duchenne cardiomyopathy presenting with chest pain and troponin elevation. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2017;4(4):307–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yamaguchi H, Awano H, Yamamoto T, Nambu Y, Iijima K. Serum cardiac troponin I is a candidate biomarker for cardiomyopathy in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Muscle Nerve. 2022;65(5):521–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sheybani A, Crum K, Raucci FJ, Burnette WB, Markham LW, Soslow JH. Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients: troponin leak in asymptomatic and implications for drug toxicity studies. Pediatr Res. 2022;92(6):1613–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Barthel BL, Cox D, Barbieri M, Ziemba M, Straub V, Hoffman EP, et al. Elevation of fast but not slow troponin I in the circulation of patients with Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2021;64(1):43–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. van Putten M, Hulsker M, Nadarajah VD, van Heiningen SH, van Huizen E, van Iterson M, et al. The effects of low levels of dystrophin on mouse muscle function and pathology. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2): e31937.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. van Putten M, Hulsker M, Young C, Nadarajah VD, Heemskerk H, van der Weerd L, et al. Low dystrophin levels increase survival and improve muscle pathology and function in dystrophin/utrophin double-knockout mice. FASEB J. 2013;27(6):2484–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Roberts TC, Blomberg KE, McClorey G, El Andaloussi S, Godfrey C, Betts C, et al. Expression analysis in multiple muscle groups and serum reveals complexity in the microRNA transcriptome of the mdx mouse with implications for therapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2012;1(8):e39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Roberts TC, Godfrey C, McClorey G, Vader P, Briggs D, Gardiner C, et al. Extracellular microRNAs are dynamic non-vesicular biomarkers of muscle turnover. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(20):9500–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Hu J, Kong M, Ye Y, Hong S, Cheng L, Jiang L. Serum miR-206 and other muscle-specific microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurochem. 2014;129(5):877–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Carter ND, Heath R, Jeffery S. Serum-carbonic-anhydrase-III in Duchenne dystrophy. Lancet. 1980;2(8193):542.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Carter ND, Heath R, Jeffery S, Jackson MJ, Newham DJ, Edwards RH. Carbonic anhydrase III in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Chim Acta. 1983;133(2):201–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hibi N, Shima K, Tashiro K, Tsuzuki K, Tsukada Y, Hirai H. Development of a highly sensitive enzyme-immunoassay for serum carbonic anhydrase-III. J Neurol Sci. 1984;65(3):333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Mokuno K, Riku S, Sugimura K, Takahashi A, Kato K, Osugi S. Serum creatine kinase isoenzymes in Duchenne muscular dystrophy determined by sensitive enzyme immunoassay methods. Muscle Nerve. 1987;10(5):459–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Brody EN, Willis MC, Smith JD, Jayasena S, Zichi D, Gold L. The use of aptamers in large arrays for molecular diagnostics. Mol Diagn. 1999;4(4):381–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Rohloff JC, Gelinas AD, Jarvis TC, Ochsner UA, Schneider DJ, Gold L, et al. Nucleic acid ligands with protein-like side chains: modified aptamers and their use as diagnostic and therapeutic agents. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014;3(10): e201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Omenn GS, Lane L, Overall CM, Pineau C, Packer NH, Cristea IM, et al. The 2022 report on the human proteome from the HUPO human proteome project. J Proteome Res. 2023;22(4):1024–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Evans WJ, Shankaran M, Smith EC, Morris C, Nyangau E, Bizieff A, et al. Profoundly lower muscle mass and rate of contractile protein synthesis in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Physiol. 2021;599(23):5215–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Viollet L, Gailey S, Thornton DJ, Friedman NR, Flanigan KM, Mahan JD, et al. Utility of cystatin C to monitor renal function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40(3):438–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. van den Bergen JC, Wokke BH, Janson AA, van Duinen SG, Hulsker MA, Ginjaar HB, et al. Dystrophin levels and clinical severity in Becker muscular dystrophy patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(7):747–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ricci G, Bello L, Torri F, Schirinzi E, Pegoraro E, Siciliano G. Therapeutic opportunities and clinical outcome measures in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(Suppl 2):625–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Stimpson G, Chesshyre M, Baranello G, Muntoni F. Lessons learned from translational research in neuromuscular diseases: impact on study design, outcome measures and managing expectation. Front Genet. 2021;12:759994.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Alfano LN, Lowes LP, Dvorchik I, Yin H, Maus EG, Flanigan KM, et al. Pilot study evaluating motivation on the performance of timed walking in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24:P860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Chamberlain JS. Gene therapy of muscular dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(20):2355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Mendell JR, Sahenk Z, Lehman K, Nease C, Lowes LP, Miller NF, et al. Assessment of systemic delivery of rAAVrh74.MHCK7.micro-dystrophin in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1122–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Brown KJ, Marathi R, Fiorillo AA, Ciccimaro EF, Sharma S, Rowlands DS, et al. Accurate quantitation of dystrophin protein in human skeletal muscle using mass spectrometry. J Bioanal Biomed. 2012;Suppl 7:001.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Farrokhi V, Walsh J, Palandra J, Brodfuehrer J, Caiazzo T, Owens J, et al. Dystrophin and mini-dystrophin quantification by mass spectrometry in skeletal muscle for gene therapy development in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Gene Ther. 2021;29(10–11):608–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mary Cunnion and Nicholas Raymond for IGNITE DMD clinical sample and data collection; Sharon McGonigle, Jenny Marlowe, Jessie Hanrahan, Pat Gonzales, and Brian Collins for their technical assistance in the manuscript preparation; and Diane Golebiowski, Joel S. Schneider, Joe N. Kornegay, Edward C. Smith, and William J. Evans for the sample collection and sharing. We acknowledge Agada Biosciences and Michael W. Lawlor as the provider of the mdx preclinical data and Somalogic, Inc., as the provider of the proteomic data measured using the modified aptamer-based SomaScan® Assay. SomaScan® and SOMAmer® are registered trademarks of Somalogic, Inc., and are used under license.

Funding

None received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Solid Biosciences, 500 Rutherford Avenue 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02129, USA

    Jessica F. Boehler

  2. Rejuvenate Bio, 11425 Sorrento Valley Road, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA

    Kristy J. Brown

  3. National Institute for Health and Care Research Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre/University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK

    Valeria Ricotti

  4. PHDL Consulting LLC, 43 Sylvanus Wood Lane, Woburn, MA, 01801, USA

    Carl A. Morris

Authors
  1. Jessica F. Boehler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristy J. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Valeria Ricotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carl A. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JFB wrote the manuscript. JFB and KJB carried out experiments and analyzed the data. JFB, KJB, VR, and CAM contributed to the research design, interpretation of the findings, and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica F. Boehler.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The IGNITE DMD trial (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03368742) was carried out under IRB approval at both the University of Florida (#IRB201700662) and the University of California Los Angeles (#18–001830). All legal guardians and/or participants participating provided written informed consent before enrollment.

Competing interests

Jessica F Boehler is an employee and holds equity in Solid Biosciences Inc. Kristy J Brown, Valeria Ricotti and Carl A Morris are former employees and hold equity in Solid Biosciences Inc. Carl A Morris acts as an advisor for Solid Biosciences Inc.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boehler, J.F., Brown, K.J., Ricotti, V. et al. N-terminal titin fragment: a non-invasive, pharmacodynamic biomarker for microdystrophin efficacy. Skeletal Muscle 14, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-023-00334-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-023-00334-y

Skeletal Muscle

ISSN: 2044-5040

Contact us